You learned about the traditional SDLC (waterfall) and agile methods of software development. Where SDLC is known for distinct, rigid phases, the agile method has smaller

In your opinion, does the SDLC or agile method ensure greater success in incorporating adequate security into an application’s code? Why?

Introduction

The question of whether or not the SDLC or agile method is more successful at ensuring adequate security in an application’s code is a difficult one to answer. Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, but many developers will tell you that neither method is perfect by itself. That’s why it’s important to look at these methods together and see how they can work together toward achieving greater success in integrating security into your codebase effectively.

Waterfall

The waterfall model is a sequential approach to software development. It moves from one phase to another, where each stage must be completed before the next can begin. There is no backtracking within this method. Each phase has a set of deliverable items that must be prepared and delivered in order for it to be accepted by management as complete and ready for release into production (or at least into testing).

Throughout these cycles, there are many potential problems that could arise due to poor planning or lack of attention on part of developers during their work time. These issues may result in delays in release dates or even cancellations altogether due to lack of resources available within an organization’s budgeting process; however, these issues do not affect all projects equally since they vary depending upon factors such as size/scaleability etcetera…

Agile

Agile is a method of software development that emphasizes communication, collaboration and flexibility.

Agile is generally considered to be more flexible than waterfall.

It’s also better suited for security requirements because it allows teams to make changes quickly as they learn about problems or find solutions for them.

The argument for waterfall or agile.

The argument for waterfall or agile.

Waterfall is better for large projects, because it’s easier to manage.

Agile is better for small projects, because you can adapt your process as new requirements emerge and change over time.

Conclusion

The debate between waterfall and agile will likely continue for years to come, but it’s important to remember that the right approach can be a matter of personal preference. If you’re looking for a way to achieve better security in your application, then an agile approach may be more helpful than you think.