- Create a PowerPoint or Prezi presentation with 13 slides, providing information about the United States Constitution. to educate a group of students or adults about the core tenets listed below for an upcoming Constitution Day celebration in a school setting.
- You may select a grade level 1-12, teachers, or parents as your audience. Please specify your intended audience and include other pertinent information within the speaker notes. Your presentation should be engaging and appropriate for your chosen audience.
- Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include a minimum of 50-100 words in your speaker notes per slide.
- Provide slides on the following topics:
- Title Slide
- Basic Structure of the Constitution
- The Rationale to create the United State Constitution
- The Primary ‘Architect’ of the Constitution
- The Powers of Congress
- The Powers of the President
- The Powers of Judiciary
- The Concept of ‘Limited Government’
- Federalism
- The System of Checks and Balances
- The Bill of Rights
- The Constitutional Amendment Process
- Reference Slide
Constitution Day Presentation – Rubric
Presentation of U.S. Constitution Core Tenets 50 points
Criteria Description
Create a 13-slide presentation about the core tenets of the U.S. Constitution for a
Constitution Day celebration.
5. Target 50 points
All of the listed core tenets of the U.S. Constitution are thoroughly presented and
clearly delineated.
4. Acceptable 43.5 points
All of the listed core tenets of the U.S. Constitution are presented clearly with a
logical progression of ideas.
3. Approaching 39.5 points
All of the listed core tenets of the U.S. Constitution are adequately presented.
2. Insufficient 37 points
Some of the core tenets of the U.S. Constitution are minimally presented and are
overgeneralized, or lacking detail. One or more core tenets from the list are
missing.
Speaker notes 15 points
Criteria Description
Speaker notes include content-related commentary for each slide, in a minimum of 50-
100 words.
5. Target 15 points
Speaker notes are clear and thoroughly describe content presented on each slide.
Minimum word count is met.
4. Acceptable 13.05 points
Speaker notes are clear and brief with appropriate details. Minimum required word
count is met.
Collapse All
3. Approaching 11.85 points
Speaker notes are included with some detail. Minimum required word count is met.
2. Insufficient 11.1 points
Speaker notes are not complete sentences and do not appropriately describe the
content of the slide. Minimum word count is not met.
Audience, Engagement, Content, and Language 15 points
Criteria Description
Intended audience is specified. Presentation is engaging and content and language is
appropriate to the chosen audience.
5. Target 15 points
Intended audience is specified, and the writer uses a variety of sentence
constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways
that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. Presentation is highly
engaging for chosen audience.
4. Acceptable 13.05 points
Intended audience is specified, and the writer is clearly aware of audience. Uses a
variety of appropriate vocabulary to enhance the content for the specified
audience. Presentation is engaging for chosen audience.
3. Approaching 11.85 points
Intended audience is specified, and the vocabulary and content are appropriate for
the intended audience. Presentation is moderately engaging for chosen audience.
2. Insufficient 11.1 points
Intended audience is specified, however the vocabulary and content are not
appropriate for the intended audience. Presentation is only slightly engaging for
chosen audience.
Layout 10 points
Criteria Description
Layout
5. Target 10 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with
appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in
length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance
the readability of the text.
4. Acceptable 8.7 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to
be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for
headings and text.
3. Approaching 7.9 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the
fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long
paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
2. Insufficient 7.4 points
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting
with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is
difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
Mechanics of Writing 5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 4.35 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 3.95 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 3.7 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
h i
Format/Documentation 5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable 4.35 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 3.95 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 3.7 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Total 100 points