Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Person-focused pay programs are not really new. Various early forms of these programs appeared in the 1980s. Organizational adoption was slow partly because they can very quickly drive - Writingforyou

Person-focused pay programs are not really new. Various early forms of these programs appeared in the 1980s. Organizational adoption was slow partly because they can very quickly drive

OVERVIEW
Person-focused pay programs are not really new. Various early forms of these programs appeared in the 1980s. Organizational adoption was slow partly because they can very quickly drive labor costs up. Why is this changing? Explain the reasons for this change. Consider Susan Jackson’s situation. Susan is a young professional in her 8th year of her technological manufacturing career since graduating from college. She is frustrated by the lack of opportunity to showcase her talent and skillset. Susan feels like she has so much more to offer than is asked of her. Consequently, she is once again on the job market. If she succeeds in her search, Susan will join her third organization in 8 years. Explain why a job with a person-focused pay program might help alleviate her frustration. Finally, what are the potential advantages and disadvantages of these programs for the organization? For the employee?

INSTRUCTIONS
Respond to the discussion questions provided. The assignment requires 3 – 4 full pages and at least 5 scholarly resources to substantiate your position in your answer. You must carefully read the requirements below noting the expectations beforehand. 

  The specific requirements are as follows:
 As a graduate student, the expectation is quite high for your required quality and effort. Your work
must be written near the standard and quality of journals and other published materials.
 Cover page, abstract, reference page, and appendices do not count toward the minimum page
length requirement.
 At least 5 scholarly sources are required.
 Use the current APA manual to ensure that you correctly cite your sources andquotations.
 The use of sources such as Wikipedia, Investopedia, blogs, personal, consulting or corporate
websites are discouraged and will not count toward the required 5 references.
 Use of term paper or solutions-type websites is not allowed and will be treated according to the
terms of academic honesty requirements.
 Do not write in question/answer format

GRADING RUBRIC ATTACHED

Criteria Ratings Points

Content and Development

40 to >35 pts

Advanced

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. All topics are thoroughly addressed and/or all questions are answered. Minimum word count is reached.

35 to >27 pts

Proficient

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. All or most topics are generally but not comprehensively addressed and all or most questions are answered. Minimum word count is reached.

27 to >0 pts

Developing

Assignment is missing key elements; lacks contextual presentation and the central thesis of the project is unclear. Information has little or no relation to the main topic. Topics and/or questions were not addressed satisfactorily. Minimum word count is not reached.

0 pts

Not Present

40 pts

Writing Grading Rubric | BUSI645_B02_202330

Criteria Ratings Points

Depth and Organization

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. Ideas flow in a logical sequence. The structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow. The paper’s organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. Paragraph transitions are present, logical, and direct the flow of thought throughout the paper. The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas. The conclusion reviews the major points toward the appropriate audience.

26 to >20 pts

Proficient

The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews most major points. Ideas flow in a fairly logical sequence. The structure of the paper is somewhat hard to follow. The paper’s organization does not emphasize the central theme or purpose. Paragraph transitions are mostly present, logical, and direct the flow of thought throughout the paper. Comprehensive conclusion missing.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews one or two major points. Some breaks in logic are present. The structure of the paper is somewhat clear and easy to follow. The paper’s organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. Paragraph transitions are missing on some sections. The conclusion somewhat derives from the paper’s ideas. The conclusion may not review the major points toward the appropriate audience.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Writing Grading Rubric | BUSI645_B02_202330

Criteria Ratings Points

Grammar/ Punctuation/ Spelling and Formatting

30 to >26 pts

Advanced

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. Spelling is correct. The paper follows APA format guidelines. The paper is written in 12pt font, Times New Roman, double-spaced and 1” margins. The work is original, giving credit to all borrowed ideas.

26 to >20 pts

Proficient

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are generally followed but some mistakes are evident. Spelling is correct. The paper follows APA format guidelines but with some mistakes. The paper is written in 12pt font, Times New Roman, double-spaced and 1” margins. The work is original, giving credit to all borrowed ideas.

20 to >0 pts

Developing

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are generally followed but many mistakes are evident. Spelling is incorrect in places. The paper fails to follow APA format guidelines to include: Written in 12pt font, Times New Roman, double- spaced and 1” margins. The work is original, giving credit to all borrowed ideas.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Total Points: 100

Writing Grading Rubric | BUSI645_B02_202330