Follow rubric
instructions is in power point
Reading: Global Health Care: Issues and Policies, Chapters 2, 3, and 4
Textbook link: https://bncvirtual.com/vb_econtent.php?ACTION=econtent&FVENCKEY=AD9EE8D798DCAFC7E76B5FB7C978DD86&j=43766531&sfmc_sub=1597096465&l=23329524_HTML&u=695880241&mid=524003857&jb=40753&utm_term=10242022&utm_source=transactional&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Direct_Ebooks
Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Keep in mind that the letters to the editor of professional journals should be clear and concise and written in the third person.
Welcome to IHP 501 Global Health and Diversity
Overview of Module Two
Term 23TW4
IHP 501 Course Facilitator/Instructor/Professor
Dr. Johnstone
1
IHP 501 Module Two: 2-1 Activity
Overview
Letters to the editor can be a platform for experts in their fields to share perspectives on debated issues of the day.
As a healthcare professional, you are uniquely positioned to compare the United States to other health systems around the globe.
Despite the high expenditures in the United States, outcomes are still poor compared to other nations.
Why is there a mismatch between healthcare spending and outcomes in the United States?
How does the United States compare to other developed and developing countries?
Image accessed from
IHP 501 Module Two: 2-1 Activity
Prompt
You have been invited to provide a letter to the editor of a scholarly health journal.
The editor has requested that you identify the financial impacts of health and non-health policies in developed and developing countries.
Specifically, how do these policies impact cost expenditures in the United States?
Be sure to include specific points evaluating healthcare infrastructure, political barriers, and social inequities impacting health outcomes in developed and developing societies.
Note that you should cite at least three scholarly sources from your investigation. The evidence should not be older than five years. To access the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate, go to the Start Here section of the course.
Image accessed from https://www.mitchellrepublic.com/opinion/letters
IHP 501 Module Two: 2-1 Activity
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Healthcare Costs: Explain the causes of high healthcare spending in the United States compared to other developed and developing countries.
Structural Causes: Describe the healthcare infrastructure of the United States and compare it to those of other countries (e.g. Canada, Germany, United Kingdom). In what ways do these structural components (Consider: public & private health insurance, pharmaceutical & technology, informatics, funding by each state, underinsurance) drive up healthcare spending in the United States?
Political Causes: Analyze health and non-health policies (Consider: Identify a specific health policy – Affordable Care Act; Medicare, etc.) in the United States and compare them to those of other countries. In what ways do these political factors drive up healthcare spending in the United States?
Image accessed from https://medicaldialogues.in/news/health/govt-to-invest-rs-64000-crore-in-health-infrastructure-mandaviya-85134
IHP 501 Module Two: 2-1 Activity
2. Healthcare Outcomes: Explain the results of high healthcare spending in the United States compared to other developed and developing countries.
Effectiveness: Evaluate the healthcare outcomes (discussion related to benefits, strengths, or weaknesses) of the United States considering its spending. To what extent does the United States benefit from its high healthcare spending compared to other nations?
Inequities: Evaluate the inequities (Inequity refers to unfair, avoidable differences arising from poor governance, corruption or cultural exclusion (National Academies of Science, 2017) generated by healthcare costs in the United States as compared to other countries. To what extent do healthcare outcomes differ amongst various groups in the United States?
APA Format Short Paper
Guidelines for Submission
Your short paper must be a 2- to 3-page Word document, not including the title page and references. It must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All references must be cited in APA form
References (always starts on new or separate page)
Note that you should cite at least three scholarly sources from your investigation. The evidence should not be older than five years. To access the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate, go to the Start Here section of the course.
IHP 501 Module Two: 2-2 Project Prep Stakeholders Short Paper
Overview
Stakeholder support is critical for the success of short-term volunteer aid trips. Working responsibly and effectively with host staff is particularly important, but there are other potential stakeholders to consider.
These stakeholders might be from other not-for-profits, NGOs, philanthropists, academic institutions, government agencies, lobbyists, or other interested groups.
Investigating potential stakeholder support is a critical step in developing humanitarian aid interventions. It allows you to answer the questions:
Who will implement the intervention strategies? How will you leverage and strengthen existing community resources? Who will ensure accountability and measure success?
IHP 501 Module Two: 2-2 Project Prep Stakeholders Short Paper
Prompt
In your reading, you reviewed an example stakeholder identification table for a sexually transmitted diseases program evaluation.
For this assignment, you will craft a short paper to identify similar lists of potential stakeholders that could support your humanitarian aid trip.
Your stakeholder lists can overlap, but you should have at least eight stakeholders or stakeholder groups identified in total.
You should cite at least three sources from your
own investigation, which may include scholarly
and non-scholarly sources.
The evidence should not be older than five years. To access the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate, go to the Start Here section of the course.
Specifically, you must address the following
rubric criteria:
IHP 501 Module Two: 2-2 Project Prep Stakeholders Short Paper
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Implementers: Identify a list of at least two to four stakeholders or stakeholder groups that could serve as potential implementers for your humanitarian aid trip. For each person or group, provide a brief description and indicate why you believe they are appropriate for this task based on their mission and capabilities.
Decision Makers: Identify a list of at least two to four stakeholders or stakeholder groups that could serve as potential decision makers for your humanitarian aid trip. For each person or group, provide a brief description and indicate why you believe they are appropriate for this task based on their mission and capabilities.
IHP 501 Module Two: 2-2 Project Prep Stakeholders Short Paper
3. Participants: Identify a list of at least two to four stakeholders or stakeholder groups that could serve as potential participants for your humanitarian aid trip. For each person or group, provide a brief description and indicate why you believe they are appropriate for this task based on their mission and capabilities.
4. Partners: Identify a list of at least two to four stakeholders or stakeholder groups that could serve as potential partners for your humanitarian aid trip. For each person or group, provide a brief description and indicate why you believe they are appropriate for this task based on their mission and capabilities.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007, January). Practical use of program evaluation among
sexually transmitted disease (STD) programs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
https://www-cdc-gov.ezproxy.snhu.edu/std/program/pupestd.htm
Holtz, C. (2022). Global health care: Issues and policies (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
(chapters 2, 3, & 4).
Lasker, J. N., Aldrink, M., Balasubramaniam, P., Caldron, P., Compton, B., Evert, J., Loh, L. C., Prasad, S.,
& Siegel, S. (2018). Guidelines for responsible short-term global health activities: Developing
common principles. Globalization and Health, 14(18), 1-10. DOI 10.1186/s12992-018-0330-4
APA Format Short Paper
Guidelines for Submission
Your short paper must be a 2- to 3-page Word document, not including the title page and references. It must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All references must be cited in APA form
References (always starts on new or separate page)
Note that you should cite at least three scholarly sources from your investigation. The evidence should not be older than five years. To access the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate, go to the Start Here section of the course.
Reach out with any questions to Dr. Johnstone @ [email protected]
Image accessed from https://seanheritage.com/blog/questions/
Thank You
2500 North River Road
Manchester, NH 03106
603.xxx.xxx
snhu.edu
14
image1.jpg
media1.m4a
image4.png
media2.m4a
image5.jpeg
media3.m4a
image6.jpeg
media4.m4a
image7.jpeg
media5.m4a
image8.emf
media6.m4a
image9.jpeg
media7.m4a
image10.jpeg
media8.m4a
image11.jpeg
media9.m4a
image12.emf
media10.m4a
media11.m4a
media12.m4a
media13.m4a
image13.jpeg
image2.jpg
image3.png
media14.m4a
,
IHP_501_Module_Two_Activity_Guidelines_and_Rubric.html
Overview
Letters to the editor can be a platform for experts in their fields to share perspectives on debated issues of the day. As a healthcare professional, you are uniquely positioned to compare the United States to other health systems around the globe. Despite the high expenditures in the United States, outcomes are still poor compared to other nations. Why is there a mismatch between healthcare spending and outcomes in the United States? How does the United States compare to other developed and developing countries?
Prompt
You have been invited to provide a letter to the editor of a scholarly health journal. The editor has requested that you identify the financial impacts of health and non-health policies in developed and developing countries. Specifically, how do these policies impact cost expenditures in the United States? Be sure to include specific points evaluating healthcare infrastructure, political barriers, and social inequities impacting health outcomes in developed and developing societies.
Note that you should cite at least three scholarly sources from your investigation. The evidence should not be older than five years. To access the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate, go to the Start Here section of the course.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
- Healthcare Costs: Explain the causes of high healthcare spending in the United States compared to other developed and developing countries.
- Structural Causes: Describe the healthcare infrastructure of the United States and compare it to those of other countries. In what ways do these structural components drive up healthcare spending in the United States?
- Political Causes: Analyze health and non-health policies in the United States and compare them to those of other countries. In what ways do these political factors drive up healthcare spending in the United States?
- Healthcare Outcomes: Explain the results of high healthcare spending in the United States compared to other developed and developing countries.
- Effectiveness: Evaluate the healthcare outcomes of the United States considering its spending. To what extent does the United States benefit from its high healthcare spending compared to other nations?
- Inequities: Evaluate the inequities generated by healthcare costs in the United States as compared to other countries. To what extent do healthcare outcomes differ amongst various groups in the United States?
Guidelines for Submission
Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Keep in mind that the letters to the editor of professional journals should be clear and concise and written in the third person.
| Criteria | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (90%) | Needs Improvement (70%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Healthcare Costs: Structural Causes |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Describes the healthcare infrastructure of the United States by comparing it to other countries and describes ways these structural components drive up spending in the United States |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions |
Does not attempt criterion |
20 |
|
Healthcare Costs: Political Causes |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Analyzes health and non-health policies in the United States, compares to another country, and describes ways political factors drive up healthcare spending in the United States |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions |
Does not attempt criterion |
20 |
|
Healthcare Outcomes: Effectiveness |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Analyzes U.S. health outcomes and the extent to which the United States benefits from its high healthcare spending compared to other nations |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions |
Does not attempt criterion |
20 |
|
Healthcare Outcomes: Inequities |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner |
Evaluates inequities found in the United States generated by high healthcare costs and how inequities differ among various groups in the United States |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions |
Does not attempt criterion |
20 |
|
Articulation of Response |
Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner |
Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose |
Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability |
Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas |
5 |
|
Scholarly Sources |
Incorporates more than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or use of sources is exceptionally insightful |
Incorporates three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources that support claims |
Incorporates fewer than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or not all sources support claims |
Does not incorporate sources |
10 |
|
APA Style |
Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with no errors |
Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with fewer than five errors |
Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with five or more errors |
Does not format in-text citations and reference list according to APA style |
5 |
| Total: | 100% |