Include the following sections:
- Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
- Identify ONE client-focused quality or safety issue that may be pertinent to your future advanced nursing practice role.
- Describe the scope and impact of the issue.
- Discuss three possible roles advanced practice nurses may play in addressing the issue.
- Explain why the issue is of interest to your future role.
- Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectationsLinks to an external site.:
- Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
- Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
- Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
- Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
- Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
- Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.
- Professionalism in Communication: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
- Reference Citation: Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.
- Wednesday Participation Requirement: Provide a substantive response to the graded discussion topic (not a response to a peer or faculty) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
- Total Participation Requirement: Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.
|
NR584NP_W1 Discussion Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
Application of Knowledge view longer description |
20 pts Excellent All requirements met. 18 pts Very Good 3 requirement met. 17 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 10 pts Needs Improvement 1 requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. |
/ 20 pts |
|
Integration of Evidence view longer description |
12 pts Excellent All requirements met. 11 pts Very Good 4 requirements met. 10 pts Satisfactory 3 requirements met. 6 pts Needs Improvement 1-2 requirements met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. |
/ 12 pts |
|
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue view longer description |
13 pts Excellent All requirements met. 11 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 7 pts Needs Improvement One requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. |
/ 13 pts |
|
Professionalism in Communication view longer description |
2.5 pts Excellent 0–1 errors. 2 pts Very Good 2–3 errors. 1.5 pts Satisfactory 4-5 errors. 1 pts Needs Improvement 6-7 errors. 0 pts Unsatisfactory More than 7 errors. |
/ 2.5 pts |
|
Reference Citation view longer description |
2.5 pts Excellent 0-1 errors. 2 pts Very Good 2 errors. |