Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Analyze the lesson History Unfolded for 25-30 students in your high school social studies. This lesson was downloaded from https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/lessonplan_1 - Writingforyou

Analyze the lesson History Unfolded for 25-30 students in your high school social studies. This lesson was downloaded from https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/lessonplan_1

 

            1 student with mild cognitive challenges

            1 student with ADHD

            1 hearing impaired student

            1 visually impaired student

            1 gifted/talented student

  • Include in your modifications the following: overview of research-based strategies for teaching students with the identified need (Column A) plus details of the modifications to make for specific exceptional pupils to help him/her meet the standards (Column B).  Each modification needs to relate to a specific part of the provided lesson plan.  Develop a plan to include parents as co-partners in their child’s education.

The plan will be scored as follows:

_____Detailed modification plans for the student with mild cognitive challenges ranging from minimal to intensive

_____Detailed modification plan for the student with ADHD ranging from minimal to intensive

_____Detailed modification plan for the hearing-impaired student ranging from minimal to intensive

_____Detailed modification plan for the visually impaired student ranging from minimal to intensive

_____Detailed modification plan for the gifted/talented student ranging from minimal to intensive           

_____Specific ways to include parents as co-partners in their child’s education

Lesson Plan with Modifications

Lesson Plan with Modifications

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: student with mild cognitive challenges InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1

15 pts

Advanced

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described

12.75 pts

Proficient

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described

10.5 pts

Basic

Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student

8.25 pts

Minimal

Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing

0 pts

No Marks

Not addressed

15 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2 – Learning Differences

The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: student with student with ADHD InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1

15 pts

Advanced

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described

12.75 pts

Proficient

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described

10.5 pts

Basic

Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student

8.25 pts

Minimal

Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing

0 pts

No Marks

Not addressed

15 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2B – Learning Differences

The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: for hearing impaired student InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1

15 pts

Advanced

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described

12.75 pts

Proficient

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described

10.5 pts

Basic

Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student

8.25 pts

Minimal

Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing

0 pts

No Marks

Not addressed

15 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2C – Learning Differences

The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: for visually impaired student InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1

15 pts

Advanced

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described

12.75 pts

Proficient

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described

10.5 pts

Basic

Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student

8.25 pts

Minimal

Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing

0 pts

No Marks

Not addressed

15 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2D- Learning Differences

The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: gifted/talented student InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1

15 pts

Advanced

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described

12.75 pts

Proficient

Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described

10.5 pts

Basic

Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student

8.25 pts

Minimal

Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing