|
Week 5 Writing Assignment Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginal Assessment
|
|
6 pts
ADVANCED
The original assessment is exceptionally well-constructed, consisting of 10 thoughtful and appropriate questions. The questions align perfectly with the learning objectives.
|
5.1 pts
PROFICIENT
The original assessment is well-constructed with 10 appropriate questions that mostly align with the learning objectives.
|
4.2 pts
BASIC
The original assessment includes 10 questions but lacks clarity or alignment with some learning objectives.
|
3.3 pts
MINIMAL
The original assessment lacks coherence, with less than 10 questions or questions that do not align with learning objectives.
|
|
6 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations – Disability #1
|
|
6 pts
ADVANCED
The adapted assessment the identified disability category (mild cognitive challenges, ADHD, hearing impaired, visually impaired, gifted/talented) is meticulously designed, addressing the specific disability's needs with creativity and precision.
|
5.1 pts
PROFICIENT
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category demonstrates proficiency in addressing the specific needs of students with the identified disability, with some minor improvements possible.
|
4.2 pts
BASIC
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category tries to address the needs of students with the identified disability but lacks depth or comprehensiveness.
|
3.3 pts
MINIMAL
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category inadequately addresses the needs of students with this disability.
|
|
6 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations – Disability #2
|
|
6 pts
ADVANCED
The adapted assessment the identified disability category (mild cognitive challenges, ADHD, hearing impaired, visually impaired, gifted/talented) is meticulously designed, addressing the specific disability's needs with creativity and precision.
|
5.1 pts
PROFICIENT
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category demonstrates proficiency in addressing the specific needs of students with the identified disability, with some minor improvements possible.
|
4.2 pts
BASIC
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category tries to address the needs of students with the identified disability but lacks depth or comprehensiveness.
|
3.3 pts
MINIMAL
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category inadequately addresses the needs of students with this disability.
|
|
6 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations – Disability #3
|
|
6 pts
ADVANCED
The adapted assessment the identified disability category (mild cognitive challenges, ADHD, hearing impaired, visually impaired, gifted/talented) is meticulously designed, addressing the specific disability's needs with creativity and precision.
|
5.1 pts
PROFICIENT
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category demonstrates proficiency in addressing the specific needs of students with the identified disability, with some minor improvements possible.
|
4.2 pts
BASIC
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category tries to address the needs of students with the identified disability but lacks depth or comprehensiveness.
|
3.3 pts
MINIMAL
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category inadequately addresses the needs of students with this disability.
|
|
6 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAlignment with Goals
|
|
6 pts
ADVANCED
Both the original and adapted assessments align seamlessly with the learning objectives, showing a deep understanding of the assessment's purpose.
|
5.1 pts
PROFICIENT
The adapted assessment for the identified disability category demonstrates proficiency in addressing the specific needs of students with the identified disability, with some minor improvements possible.
|
4.2 pts
BASIC
Either the original or adapted assessment aligns with the learning objectives, but there are significant discrepancies between them.
|
3.3 pts
MINIMAL
Neither the original nor adapted assessment aligns adequately with the learning objectives.
|
|
6 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Usability
|
|
6 pts
ADVANCED
The assessments are exceptionally clear, user-friendly, and easily understandable by students without disabilities and students with disabilities.
|
5.1 pts
PROFICIENT
The assessments are clear and generally usable by students without disabilities and students with disabilities but may benefit from minor enhancements.
|
4.2 pts
BASIC
The assessments lack clarity in some aspects, making them less user-friendly for some students, either without disabilities or with disabilities.
|
3.3 pts
MINIMAL
The assessments are confusing or poorly organized, hindering both students without disabilities and students with disabilities.
|
|
6 pts
|
|
Total Points: 36
|
