This is a PPT on Healthcare Policies and Delivery Systems.Please read the rubrics. You need 15 slides, be creative. Does not have speaker notes
PPT presentation about: Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA)
· Explain health policy and the policy-making process.
· Discuss the role of nursing organizations in influencing policy regarding selected health policy/legislation.
· Discuss how this policy has impacted the healthcare system. Include how nurses can be involved in policymaking.
Rubric
Requirements 0 1 2 3 Grade received
Recent health care Legislature (3 years)
No information on Recent health care Legislature (3 years)
Information on Recent health care Legislature (5 years)
Information on Recent health care Legislature (4 years)
Information on Recent health care Legislature (3 years)
Literature review regarding issue (5 peer reviewed articles)
No literature review Literature review regarding issue (3 peer reviewed articles)
Literature review regarding issue (4 peer reviewed articles)
Literature review regarding issue (5 peer reviewed articles)
Statistical data related to issue
No Statistical data Minimal Statistical data Most Statistical data Statistical data present
Population impacted, and health outcomes of issue
No information on Population impacted, and health outcomes of issue
Minimal information on Population impacted, and health outcomes of issue
Most information on Population impacted, and health outcomes of issue
Information on Population impacted, and health outcomes of issue present
Nursing role in passing the legislature
No information on Nursing role in passing the legislature
Minimal information on Nursing role in passing the legislature
Most information on Nursing role in passing the legislature
Information on Nursing role in passing the legislature present
APA format No APA format Minimal APA format Most APA format correct
correct APA format
References within 5 years
No references References within 3 years
References within 4 years
References within 5 years
Grammar Poor grammar Minimal Proper grammar
Proper grammar Most of the time
Proper grammar always
Total:
Comments:____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
,
PPT presentation- Grading Rubric Miami Regional University- MSN5500
Dimension Competent Needs Improvement Unacceptable Introduction
40%
The topic is clear and concisely responds to the assigned/selected topic. The organization of the topic is appropriately ideas are outlined and implemented. Does not contain superfluous information.
40%
The approach is too broad or too narrow for the assigned/selected topic. The organization of the topic is difficult to follow and superficially implemented. Provides too much unnecessary information.
20%
Fails to present or respond to the assigned/selected topic. Organization of topic is missing, vague, or not consistently maintained.
0% Body of presentation
40%
All main points are well-developed; directly related to the topic. Supporting examples are concrete and detailed. There is a logical flow to the topics/arguments.
40%
Most main points are present, but not consistently pertinent to the thesis. Supporting examples are unclear or missing.
20%
The main points are poorly developed or not pertinent to the thesis. Missing supporting examples.
0% Conclusion
5%
The conclusion is clearly stated, and connections to the research and position are clear and relevant. The underlying logic is explicit.
5%
The conclusion is unclear. Partially connected to the research. Significant errors in logic.
2.5%
The conclusion is unclear. Connections to research are incorrect/unclear, or just a repetition of the findings without explanation. Underlying logic has major flaws.
0% Research (literature review)
5%
The research selected is highly relevant to the topic, and is properly incorporated into the presentation. The evidence comes from a wide variety of valid sources; minimum “required” sources published within the last 5 years.
5%
Research is relevant to the topic, yet incomplete, vague, and/or is poorly incorporated into the body paragraphs. Unclear components. Some evidence does not come from valid sources: minimum “required” sources published within the last 5 years.
2.5%
The research selected is not relevant to the topic, and is not properly incorporated into the body paragraphs. The evidence seldom comes from valid sources: minimum “required” sources published within the last 5 years.
0% Writing/ Mechanics and Voice- over-PPT
Writing is clear and concise. Writing is fluid and free from spelling and grammatical errors. Terminology is clearly defined. Writing uses the appropriate voice (active/passive).
Writing often contains spelling and grammatical errors. Writing inconsistently switches voices (active/passive).
Slides are difficult to read – do not flow logically from one part to another. There are consistent spelling and/or grammatical errors; technical terms may not be defined or are poorly defined. Writing does not use appropriate voice
PPT presentation- Grading Rubric Miami Regional University- MSN5500
5%
Voice-over-PPT used -appropriate and well understood. APA formatting appropriate.
5%
Voice-over-PPT used – unclear and poor understood APA formatting appropriate.
2.5%
(active/passive). Voice-over-PPT not used. APA formatting inappropriate.
0%
References
5%
References are precisely listed in APA (6th Edition format). In-text citations are used correctly for all quotations and paraphrasing.
5%
References are listed in APA format with frequent errors. In-text citations are missing, or contain frequent errors.
2.5%
References are not listed in the correct APA format. In-text citations are missing. PLAGIARISM will be addressed as per MRU’s policy.
0%