Use the internet to locate a lesson, exercise, assignment, activity, or lesson plan that exemplifies application of one of the concepts from cognitive developmental theory reviewed in Module Four. In your journal, describe the lesson or activity, including the theoretical concept it demonstrates, and reflect on whether and how it will impact cognitive development as intended.
What to Submit
Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Journal assignments must follow APA-style citations, and word count must be a minimum of 350 to a maximum of 750 words.
Module Four Journal Rubric
CriteriaExemplary (100%)Proficient (90%)Needs Improvement (70%)Not Evident (0%)ValueDescription of the LessonMeets “Proficient” criteria and provides detailed examples, materials, and descriptions for an in-depth presentation of the lessonJournal provides a description of the lesson that includes details to clearly communicate the target age range and instructions for the lessonJournal provides a description that lacks a level of detail, leaving the reader with questions about the lessonJournal does not provide a detailed description of the lesson30Theoretical ConceptMeets “Proficient” criteria and provides specific concepts and abilities as examples of the relationship between the lesson and a cognitive developmental theoryJournal clearly describes the relationship of the lesson to a cognitive developmental theory using specific detailsJournal proposes a relationship between the lesson and a cognitive developmental theory, but the description lacks the level of detail necessary to clarify the relationshipJournal does not provide a link between the lesson and a cognitive developmental theory30Reflection of Impact on Cognitive DevelopmentMeets “Proficient” criteria and provides reflection on the strengths and limitation of the lesson to provide the intended impact on cognitive developmentJournal provides evidence of reflection on the impacts that the lesson has on cognitive developmentJournal offers critical comments on the lesson’s ability to impact cognitive development that are not specific to the chosen theoryJournal does not provide a reflection on the lesson that would address the impact on cognitive development30Articulation of ResponseJournal is free of errors in organization and grammarJournal is mostly free of errors of organization and grammar; errors are marginal and rarely interrupt the flowJournal contains errors of organization and grammar, but they are limited enough so that journal can be understoodJournal contains errors of organization and grammar making the journal difficult to understand