Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Contracts Dr. Delgado, a pediatrician entered into an employment agreement with the All Children’s Hospital. According to the contract, after termination of her employment for any reas - Writingforyou

Contracts Dr. Delgado, a pediatrician entered into an employment agreement with the All Children’s Hospital.  According to the contract, after termination of her employment for any reas

Select two of the scenarios listed below and explain the best solution for each. Include comments related to any ethical issues that arise. 

Scenario 1—Contracts

Dr. Delgado, a pediatrician entered into an employment agreement with the All Children’s Hospital.  According to the contract, after termination of her employment for any reason, Delgado could not compete with the hospital by working within a 100-mile radius of it for two years.  One year after resigning from the hospital, Dr. Delgado opened her own pediatric practice within 75 miles of the hospital and began seeing patients.  All Children’s Hospital filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit against her.

  • Provide potential arguments for both parties regarding the breach of the non-compete contract lawsuit. Support your responses with appropriate cases, laws and other relevant examples by using at least one scholarly source from the SUO Library in addition to your textbook for each scenario.

Scenario 2—Intellectual Property

Professor Klug teaches tort law for Las Vegas School of Law, a for-profit law school.  Several times during the semester, the professor made copies of various articles and distributed them to his students.  Unbeknownst to Klug, the daughter of one of the article's authors was a student in his class.  The daughter told her father about Klug's copying, which took place without the father's or publisher's permission.  The father sues Klug for copyright infringement. Klug claims protection under the fair use doctrine.

  • Provide arguments for each party.  Determine which party will win.  Provide support for the arguments and the final answer with cases or scholarly articles from the South University Online Library.

Scenario 3—Antitrust

Mitchell Dawson and three of his friends purchased nonrefundable tickets from Live Nation Entertainment to attend a concert at the Straz Center in Tampa.  The front of the ticket included a printed statement that the price included a $10 parking fee.  Dawson and his friends hired an Uber driver to take them to the concert.

Frustrated at being charged for parking that he did not need, Dawson filed a lawsuit in federal district court against Live Nation arguing that the bundled parking fee was unfair since consumers were forced to pay it in order to attend the concert.  He asserted the tying arrangement violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

  • Present the arguments that both parties to the lawsuit would make.
  • Select a winner and support your choice.

Scenario 4—Consumer Protection

On February 1, a salesperson for Metropolitan Life Insurance met with the Drakes at their home.  The Drakes lived in a 55+ retirement community with a homeowners association that prohibited door-to-door sales.  After facing a persuasive sales pitch about the importance of providing for the surviving spouse and their kids and grandkids, the Drakes signed a contract to purchase a life insurance policy for a total of $3000 per year.  A down payment of $100 was required, with the remainder of the cost to be paid in monthly payments.  Two days later, the Drakes had second thoughts about purchasing the insurance.  Mr. Drake contacted the insurance company and stated that they had decided to cancel the contract.  The insurance company said it would be impossible to cancel the first year and the Drakes would be in breach of contract if they did not make all of the payments.

  • Did Metropolitan Life Insurance violate any consumer laws by not allowing the Drakes to rescind their contract?  Explain.

  need to see you cite and reference your work fully as well as to have it in the proper APA format.  respond to 2 classmate responses

Consumer Protection.html

Consumer Protection

Consumer transactions take a variety of forms that include acquiring goods, services, or credit for personal or family use. A collection of federal and state laws protects consumers from unfair trade practices, unsafe products, discriminatory or unreasonable credit requirements, and other problems related to consumer transactions.

In today’s consumer market, the extensive use of credit by consumers in the United States has made credit protection an especially important area regulated by the consumer protection legislation. Two significant statutes that regulate the credit and credit card industry are Title I of the Consumer Credit Protection ACT (CCPA) and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA).

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) protects consumers from unfair and deceptive trade practices, including deceptive advertising and certain telemarketing activities. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates safety and labeling of food, drugs, and cosmetics. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) regulates goods that involve consumer safety such as children’s products.

Since businesses normally provide goods and/or services, managers must have an in-depth knowledge of the consumer protection laws and develop procedures to comply with them.

Some of the most significant statutes regulating the credit and credit-card industry are:

  • Title I of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA)
  • Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA)
  • Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act)

To deepen your understanding of the concepts introduced in the lecture, consider reading some additional scholarly articles on this topic.  To get you started, review the following articles.    

Butler, H. N., & Wright, J. D. (2011). Are            state consumer protection acts really            little-FTC acts? Florida Law Review,            63(1), 163–191. (Westlaw)

Reagan, R.S. & Thompson, A.M. (2013). Credit CARD Act requirements for gift certificates, store gift cards and general-use prepaid cards. Consumer Compliance Outlook. Retrieved from https://consumercomplianceoutlook.org/2013/first-quarter/credit-card-act-requirements-gift-certicicates-gift-cards-prepaid-cards/

South University Established 1899 Call the Technical Support Help Desk 1-888-4443404 Copyright South University

,

Intellectual Property.html

Intellectual Property

Intellectual property refers to creations of the mind expressed in the form of patents, trademarks, trade names, trade secrets, and copyrights that are protected by federal law.

A copyright grants exclusive right to the publication, production, or sale of the rights to a literary, musical, or artistic work to the creator for a definite period of years. A trademark is a symbol, design, word, letter, etc., used by the owner to distinguish his products from those of competitors. Patents are rights granted to the creator of an invention for the sole right to make, use, or sell the invention for a specified period. A trade secret consists of a business process or information that cannot or should not be patented, copyrighted or trademarked but generally has commercial value.

Protection of intellectual property encourages creativity. Without protection, companies and individuals may not be as willing to invest the resources necessary to create innovative new products that improve and often save lives. Seeking legal protection to prevent unauthorized parties from profiting from a company’s intellectual property is an important priority for any company. Even though most forms of intellectual property are not listed on the balance sheet as assets, the value of such property tends to be reflected in the price of the company's stock, as well as the company’s reputation.

While the most frequent incentives for protection are related to financial issues, there are also reasons related to the health and safety of the consumer. Goods such as pharmaceuticals manufactured and sold by unauthorized parties could be hazardous to consumers’ health because they are not manufactured under the same regulations and processes as the patented or trademarked goods.

Even though the U.S. has well-defined laws for the protection of intellectual property, both domestic and international protection of intellectual property have become increasingly more difficult. Technological advancements and the ability of foreign manufacturers to produce lower-cost goods create almost unlimited opportunities for the distribution of legitimate goods that are authorized by the IPR owner. However, this same technology and low-cost production provide the same opportunities for the distribution of products that infringe on intellectual property rights. For example, anyone with a computer equipped with a CD burner and a stack of discs can illegally copy and distribute popular music and other protected works.

Let’s review a few examples to learn more about intellectual property.

Additional Materials

View the PDF transcript for Intellectual Property Q & A

South University Established 1899 Call the Technical Support Help Desk 1-888-4443404 Copyright South University

media/week3/SUO_MBA5005 W3 L2 Intellectual Property.pdf

Intellectual Property Q & A © 2017 South University

Page 2 of 2

Law and Ethics for Managers

©2017 South University

2 Intellectual Property Q & A

Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property Q & A

1. Information may be used without permission of the copyright owner if it is found on the Internet. A.True B.False Correct answer: False Much of the material distributed anonymously on the Internet is probably protected by copyright. This includes literary works, such as news articles, blog postings, advertising, photos, and other graphics.

2. Which one of the following is not an acceptable use of the fair use doctrine? A. Teaching B. Research C. All of the above are acceptable uses D. No copyrighted works may be used without permission Correct answer: C – All of the above are acceptable uses Subject to the purpose of use, nature of the work, amount used, and effect on the use on the value of the copyrighted work, the fair use doctrine allows copyrighted works to be used without permission for purposes such as news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research.

3. The copyright symbol © or the word Copyright cannot be used until the materials have been registered with the Copyright Office.

A. True B. False Correct answer: False The use of the copyright notice (the symbol ©, or the word Copyright) is the responsibility of the copyright owner and does not require advanced permission from, or registration with, the Copyright Office.

Page 3 of 2

Law and Ethics for Managers

©2017 South University

3 Intellectual Property Q & A

Intellectual Property

4.Which is the following is the best protection for a new drug to cure cancer? A. Patent B. Copyright C. Trademark D. None of the above as drugs cannot be protected Correct answer: Patent Patents protect new and nonobvious inventions. Pharmaceuticals are one of the most common products subject to patents.

,

Contracts.html

Contracts

There are four elements required for a valid contract: agreement, consideration, capacity, and legality. Agreement consists of an offer and acceptance. Consideration is something of legally sufficient value given in exchange for a promise. Contractual capacity requires a competent age and mental state. Contracts to do something prohibited by federal or state statutory law are illegal.

Contracts may be written or oral; however, the statute of frauds requires a writing for contracts involving land, payment of the debt of another, marriage, sale of goods of $500 or more, and those that cannot be performed in one year.

Contracts are regulated by common law except for sales and leases, which are governed by Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC is a collection of rules that provide uniformity for resolving issues arising in commercial transactions. A sale of goods is defined as transfer of title to tangible personal property for a price. Article 2 does not cover services, real estate, or gifts. Contracts that include both services and goods are classified according to the dominant element.

Sales of goods in the United States are regulated by Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Adopted by most states, the UCC is a collection of suggested laws that provide uniformity for resolving issues that arise in commercial transactions. Article 2 applies to sales between merchants and non-merchants.  A merchant is "a person who deals in goods of the kind or otherwise by his occupation holds himself out as having knowledge or skill peculiar to the practices or goods involved in the transaction" (U.C.C. § 2-104).

International sales of goods are generally governed by the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), which is similar to Article 2 of the UCC. The CISG does not apply to goods purchased for personal or household use, ships or aircraft, securities, negotiable instruments, and goods sold at auction.

The UCC is a complicated compilation of laws.  Let’s examine some of the most important parts of the UCC, with emphasis on the parts related to sales, e-commerce and contracts.

Additional Materials

View the PDF transcript for UCC Provisions

South University Established 1899 Call the Technical Support Help Desk 1-888-4443404 Copyright South University

media/week3/SUO_MBA5005 W3 L1 Contracts.pdf

UCC Provisions © 2017 South University

Page 2 of 2

Law and Ethics for Managers

©2017 South University

2 UCC Provisions

Contracts

U.C.C. ARTICLE 1 – GENERAL PROVISIONS

U.C.C. ARTICLE 2 – SALES

§ 2-201 Statute of Frauds

§ 2-204 Formation of Sales Contracts in General

§ 2-205 Firm Offers

§ 2-206 Contract Offer and Acceptance

§ 2-207 Additional Terms

§ 2-313 Express Warranties

§ 2-314 Implied Warranty: Merchantability; Usage of Trade

§ 2-315 Implied Warranty: Fitness for Particular Purpose

§ 2-513 Buyer's Right to Inspection of Goods

§ 2-602 Manner and Effect of Rightful Rejection of Goods

§ 2-606 Acceptance of Goods

§ 2-702 – §2-710 Seller's Remedies

§ 2-711 – §2-717 Buyer's Remedies

U.C.C. ARTICLE 2A LEASES

U.C.C. ARTICLE 3 – NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS

U.C.C. ARTICLE 4 – BANK DEPOSITS & COLLECTIONS

U.C.C. ARTICLE 4A FUNDS TRANSFER

U.C.C. ARTICLE 5 – LETTERS OF CREDIT

U.C.C. ARTICLE 6 – BULK SALES

U.C.C. ARTICLE 7 – DOCUMENTS OF TITLE

U.C.C. ARTICLE 8 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES

U.C.C. ARTICLE 9 – SECURED TRANSACTIONS

,

Warranties.html

Warranties

A warranty is a promise by a seller or manufacturer that a product will have certain characteristics or perform in a certain way. Warranties for the sale of goods are found in Article 2 of the UCC. There are two primary types of warranties: express and implied.

An express warranty is explicit guarantee by the seller that the goods have certain qualities or will perform in a certain manner and the buyer purchases the goods based on the seller’s statements. Statements of opinion, also known as puffing, do not constitute a warranty. The statement that a computer monitor has a shatter-proof screen represents an express warranty; however, the statement that the computer monitor is one of the best ever made is puffing and does not constitute an express warranty.

There are two types of implied warranties.  The implied warranty of merchantability consists of  promises made by the seller that the goods are suitable for the ordinary purposes for which they are sold. Keisha purchases a smoothie maker from Target. When Keisha attempts to make her first banana smoothie, the smoothie maker will not crush the small amount of ice needed to make a smoothie; therefore, the product has not performed for the ordinary purpose for which it was sold. 

An implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose promises that the goods are suitable for the specific purpose for which the seller recommended them and the buyer relies on the seller’s expertise. Don visits New Balance to try on running shoes because he is training for a marathon. Don and the salesperson discuss his use of the shoes. Don purchases a pair of running shoes. Since both parties are aware of the intended use of the shoes, an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose exists. If the shoes are not suitable for long distance running, the warranty will be breached.

An implied warranty is a warranty not expressly made by the seller, but inferred at law based on the circumstances or nature of the transaction. The implied warranty automatically arises from merchants for goods sold in his or her course of business (2-314).  The seller warrants that the goods are merchantable, which means the goods (1) are of average, fair or medium grade, (2) adequately packaged and labeled and (3) conform to promises on the label. 

Let’s look at a few examples of implied warranties.

Additional Materials

View the PDF transcript for Implied Warranties

South University Established 1899 Call the Technical Support Help Desk 1-888-4443404 Copyright South University

media/week3/SUO_MBA5005 W3 L4 Warranties.pdf

Implied Warranties © 2017 South University

Page 2 of 2

Law and Ethics for Managers

©2017 South University

2 Implied Warranties

Warranties

1. Merchantable Food (2-314)

 Serving of food or drinks in a public establishment has an implied warranty of

merchantability.

 Assumption that food is fit to eat.

 Natural ingredients versus foreign

 Bones might be found in fish, but roaches should not be found in salads.

Example  Rick broke a tooth on a piece of shell found while eating a crab cake at Crabby Bills.

After having the tooth removed, Rick filed suit against Crabby Bills and the supplier of

crabs.

 The court in the actual case ruled that neither the restaurant nor its supplier had a duty to

protect the customer from tooth injuries when Rick bit into a piece of crab shell while

eating a crab cake. Crab shell was natural to a crab case and one who eats crab can

reasonably anticipate and guard against eating a piece of shell.

 The court would likely rule differently if a foreign substance not normally associated

with the food was found, such as roaches and fingers in chili.

2. Fitness for a Particular Purpose (2-315)

 Specific vs. Ordinary Purpose Differs from ordinary purpose of merchantability. Goods can be merchantable for

ordinary purposes but unfit for a particular purpose.

 One model of washing machine is suitable for handling 10 pounds of

household laundry, but it would not be suitable for 15 pounds or daily use for

commercial purposes.

 Knowledge and Reliance Requirements Seller must have reason to know purpose, and buyer must have relied on the

recommendation.

 Beth told the salesman that she needed a washing machine that would handle

15 pounds of laundry at a time. If Beth purchases a washer based on the

salesman’s recommendation and the machine only washes 10 pounds

effectively, the salesman breached the warranty of fitness for a particular

purpose.