Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Social Determinants of Health (Economic Stability): Reduce the proportion of people living in poverty - Writingforyou

Social Determinants of Health (Economic Stability): Reduce the proportion of people living in poverty

I have attached the assignment guidelines and instructions.

Topic: Social Determinants of Health (Economic Stability): Reduce the proportion of people living in poverty.

APA Style writing

Let me know if you need anything else from me.

Here are some helpful articles about the topic:

https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/economic-stability

https://health.gov/healthypeople/about/workgroups/social-determinants-health-workgroup

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233592/

UTPB School of Nursing NURS 4310-Social Determinants of Health

Selected Topics Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to select one of the five domains within social determinants of health and evaluate the collaborative efforts put forth by various workgroups toward specific objectives within the selected domain. The student will also identify if any health policies have helped or hindered their efforts.

Course Objectives

This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes:

· Describe the five domains of social determinants of health

· Analyze the impact of social determinants of health on health disparities, inequalities, and health related outcomes

· Examine the effects of health policies on global health outcomes

· Formulate strategies to promote effective collaborations across professions to enhance healthcare access

Module Objectives

This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following module objectives:

· Describe the SDoH workgroup objectives

· Identify lead federal agencies that assist in addressing SDoH

Due Date

Submit your completed paper by the end of Week 7.

Requirements

1. This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the quality of writing, the use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.

2. Create your essay using Microsoft Word (a part of Microsoft Office. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx”.

3. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about your essay may be posted under the Q&A Forum.

4. The length of the reflection is to be no less than 750 words and no greater than 1000 words, excluding the title and reference pages.

5. APA format is required with both a title page and a reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered):

a. Introduction

b. SDoH Domain including objectives

c. SDoH Workgroup objectives that apply to chosen domain

d. Are there any Policies that help or hinder progress?

e. Conclusion

Directions and Grading Criteria

Category

Points

%

Description

Introduction

5

5

Introduces the purpose of the paper in a concise, well written manner.

SDoH Domain including objectives

20

20

Provides detailed description of the chosen SDoH Domain including objectives. Be sure to use examples from selected readings, threaded discussions, and/or applications to support your assertions.

SDoH Workgroup objectives that apply to chosen domain

25

25

SDoH Workgroup objectives evaluated in detail; student explains how the workgroup is making an impact toward the domain.

Policy

25

25

Identifies and describes any health related policies that help or hinder the workgroup’s progress. If no policies are discovered, identifies potential policies that could help.

Conclusion

5

5

An effective conclusion identifies the main ideas and major conclusions from the body of your essay. Minor details are left out.

Clarity of writing

10

10

Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure. No spelling errors or typographical errors. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers.

APA format

10

10

All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA (6th ed.) format:

1. Document setup

2. Title and reference pages

Citations in the text and references

Total:

100

100

A quality essay will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Meets Criteria

Partially Meets Criteria

Does Not Meet Criteria

Introduction

5 points

Short introduction of selected SDoH domain. Rationale is well presented and purpose fully developed.

4–5 points

Basic understanding and/or limited use of original explanation and/or inappropriate emphasis on an area.

2–3 points

Little or very general introduction of selected SDoH. Little to no original explanation; inappropriate emphasis on an area.

0–1 points

SDoH Domain including objectives

20 points

Excellent description of the selected SDoH domain and objectives. Current data is included describing whether objectives are being met or not.

15–20 points

Basic description of the selected SDoH domain and objectives. Some data is included describing whether objectives are being met or not.

8–14 points

Little or very general description of the selected SDoH domain and objectives. Little to no data is included describing whether objectives are being met or not.

0–7 points

SDoH Workgroup objectives that apply to chosen domain

25 points

SDoH workgroup objectives evaluated in detail; student explains how the workgroup is making an impact toward the domain..

16-25 points

SDoH workgroup objectives evaluated but lacks detail; impact is not addressed.

8-15points

SDoH workgroup objectives not evaluated; Little or very general description of impact is addressed.

0-7 points

Policy

25 points

Identifies and describes any health related policies that help or hinder the workgroup’s progress. If no policies are discovered, identifies potential policies that could help.

16-25 points

Student identifies policies but lacks description.

8-15 points

Little or very general description of policies or does not provide potential policies.

0-7 points

Conclusion

5 points

Excellent understanding of selected SDoH domain, objectives, and workgroup effectivess. Conclusions are well evidenced and fully developed.

4–5 points

Conclusion is included; lacks support and not fully developed.

2-3 points

Little to no original explanation.

0–1 point

Clarity of writing

10 points

Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.

8–10 points

Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.

5–7 points

Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.

0–4 points

APA format

10 points

APA format correct with no more than 1–2 minor errors.

8-10 points

3–5 errors in APA format and/or 1–2 citations are missing.

5-7 points

APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.

0-4 points

Total Points Possible = 100 points

NURS 4310 Selected Topics Guidelines.docx MG 8/6/2022

2