Rumsfeld v Padilla Discuss the main argument before the US Supreme Court.

Several Assignments

Please see due dates below:

Discussion forum 301: Due Wednesday 8/30/2023 at 6pm $6

Critical Thinking 350: Due Wednesday 8/30/2023 at 6pm $6

Week 3 Annotated Bibliography 400: Due Sunday 9/3/2023 at 10am $10

Case Study Week 3: Due Sunday 9/3/2023 at 10am $8

See attachments

HSE 400

Week 3 Case Study

Listed below are topics I would like for you to discuss. Refer to the textbook, and weekly materials, when researching the topics for this Discussion Forum. Put your writing into your own words, do not copy directly from the source. If you incorporate external resources be sure to cite them properly. Lastly, review how to paraphrase and quote resources before you begin posting.

· Rumsfeld v Padilla – Discuss the main argument before the US Supreme Court. Do you agree with the concurring opinions or the dissenting opinions? Did detaining Padilla violate any of his constitutional rights afforded to any other U.S. citizen? Did the President have the authority to hold Padilla?

APA Format, 500 words

See Rubric Below

Wk 3 & 6 Case Study Rubric

Criteria	20 points	26 points
Substance of Brief	2 components were addressed properly	All 3 components of the brief were addressed properly
Criteria	16 points	24 points
Opinion Component	Opinion points were apparent with some supporting details provided that demonstrated some critical thinking. Includes factual inferences that are not supported. Lacks a sophisticated tone, but is readable and understandable.	Opinion points were well developed with substantial, relevant supporting details that demonstrated critical thinking. Includes facts that are important to the analysis and conclusion. The opinion is concise, and the reader has all necessary information.
Criteria	12 points	14 Points
APA Style: In-Text Citations and References	APA style was used with some errors. Some in-text citations conform to APA style AND/OR some references are cited correctly AND/OR there is some accuracy between in-text citations and the references.	APA style was mostly used accurately and consistently. Most or all in-text citations conform to APA style. Most or all references are cited correctly. There is accuracy between in-text citations and the references.
Criteria	12 points	18 points
Overall Mechanics / Professionalism	Case study contained some APA, grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and/or punctuation errors, distracting from professionalism. (3 to 5 errors)	Case study was written in a professional manner using APA guidelines and were mostly free of grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors. (Less than 3 errors)
Criteria	6 points	8 points	12 points	14 points	18 points
Length	Case Study was between 300-349 words	Case Study was between 350-399 words	Case Study was between 400- 449 words	Case Study was between 450- 499 words	Case Study was 500 words

HSE350

Annotated Bibliography

Topic Chosen: Cybersecurity and the impact it plays on government/national security. List and describe some of the events and incidences that have formed the necessity for cybersecurity.

This week, your Annotated Bibliography is due. You will be creating an annotated bibliography with research-based articles based upon the topic you selected last week. Your annotated bibliography will contain at least 4 primary resources; each source, should be one paragraph that is approximately 100-300 words in length.

An annotation should include the following information:

· A brief summary of the source

· The source’s strengths and weaknesses

· Its conclusions

· Why the source is relevant to your topic

· Its relationships to other topics related to your topic

· An evaluation of the research methodology (if applicable)

· Information about the author’s background

· Your personal conclusions about the source

You will need to create a title page and a references page! Additionally, your annotated bibliography needs to be in format. After submission, you will be given feedback over your items. Once your professor completes grading this assignment, please review his/her comments and make corrections based on their recommendations for your final submission.

See Rubric Below

Grading Rubrics

4. Wk 3 Essay: Annotated Bibliography Rubric

Annotated Bibliography (100 points):

CATEGORY	10 points	20 points	30 points
Source Selection	Some sources chosen are irrelevant to the topic or not scholarly; writer may need additional sources to complete research	Most sources chosen are relevant to the topic; may require a small amount of additional research	Sources chosen are scholarly and highly relevant to the topic
Annotations	Some annotations are effective; others need improvement or added depth	Almost all annotations are effective and appropriate; one may need improvement or added depth	Annotations effectively and appropriately describe the source material in thorough, organized paragraphs
	5 points	10 points	20 points
APA/MLA Style	APA formatting style is generally effective but contains one major error, or frequent minor errors	Uses APA formatting/style with only a few minor, infrequent errors	Uses APA formatting accurately and consistently
Mechanics, Grammar, and Proofing	Some significant or frequent errors present	Occasional minor errors do not distract the reader	Virtually free of mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors

HSE400

Annotated Bibliography

Topic Chosen: A captured individual who has filed a lawsuit against the government for wrongful detention and assess the legal and moral aspects of the suit

An annotation should include the following information:

· A brief summary of the source

· The source’s strengths and weaknesses

· Its conclusions

· Why the source is relevant to your topic

· Its relationships to other topics related to your topic

· An evaluation of the research methodology (if applicable)

· Information about the author’s background

· Your personal conclusions about the source

See Rubric Below

4. Wk 3 Essay: Annotated Bibliography

Annotated Bibliography (100 points):

CATEGORY	10 points	20 points	30 points
Source Selection	Some sources chosen are irrelevant to the topic or not scholarly; writer may need additional sources to complete research	Most sources chosen are relevant to the topic; may require a small amount of additional research	Sources chosen are scholarly and highly relevant to the topic
Annotations	Some annotations are effective; others need improvement or added depth	Almost all annotations are effective and appropriate; one may need improvement or added depth	Annotations effectively and appropriately describe the source material in thorough, organized paragraphs
	5 points	10 points	20 points
APA/MLA Style	APA formatting style is generally effective but contains one major error, or frequent minor errors	Uses APA formatting/style with only a few minor, infrequent errors	Uses APA formatting accurately and consistently
Mechanics, Grammar, and Proofing	Some significant or frequent errors present	Occasional minor errors do not distract the reader	Virtually free of mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors

Discussion Post HSE 301

Continuing severe weather is causing widespread damage. There are multiple impacts in the community. Vehicle movements is constrained, some people are stranded and are in need of assistance, there have been impacts on communications and power, and some structures are impacted. 9-1-1 operators are receiving conﬂicting reports about a number of life-safety needs, including some weather-related injuries and an unveriﬁed report of the structural collapse of an assisted living facility.

Identify what you believe are the top three challenges for oﬃcials to manage in this incident. Explain why you think these are the most diﬃcult or most important to be managed at this time. How could an Incident Command System be used to manage these challenges?

Posts that contain items such as "I agree" that do not further the conversation/topic will not earn credit. Further, put your writing into your own words, do not copy directly from a source. If you incorporate scholarly/peer reviewed sources in your posts, be sure to cite them properly in APA format.

There is no word count.

See Rubric Below

	2 points	3 points	4 points	5 points
Engagement / Interaction	N/A – no points are available for this criterion	engaged in a meaningful and relevant dialog with at least one peers	N/A – no points are available for this criterion	engaged in a meaningful and relevant dialog with two or more peers
Participation	N/A – no points are available for this criterion	participated on one days=	N/A – no points are available for this criterion	participated on two or more days
Content / Topic Relevance	discussion forum contributions rarely addressed the main topic	discussion forum contributions sometimes addressed the main topic	discussion forum contributions very often addressed the main topic	discussion forum contributions always addressed the main topic
Timeliness	N/A – no points are available for this criterion	responded to main topic one day after the first post due date	N/A – no points are available for this criterion	responded to main topic the day of the first post due date
Content / Topic Knowledge	displays a fair understanding of the material	displays a good understanding of the material	displays a very good understanding of the material	displays an excellent understanding of the material

NIST Special Publication 800-150

Guide to Cyber Threat Information Sharing

Chris Johnson Lee Badger

David Waltermire Julie Snyder

Clem Skorupka

This publication is available free of charge from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-150

C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y

NIST Special Publication 800-150

Guide to Cyber Threat Information Sharing

Chris Johnson Lee Badger

David Waltermire Computer Security Division

Information Technology Laboratory

Julie Snyder Clem Skorupka

The MITRE Corporation

This publication is available free of charge from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-150

October 2016

U.S. Department of Commerce Penny Pritzker, Secretary

National Institute of Standards and Technology Willie May, Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and Director

Authority

This publication has been developed by NIST in accordance with its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014, 44 U.S.C. § 3551 et seq., Public Law (P.L.) 113-283. NIST is responsible for developing information security standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements for federal information systems, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national security systems without the express approval of appropriate federal officials exercising policy authority over such systems. This guideline is consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130.

Nothing in this publication should be taken to contradict the standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory authority. Nor should these guidelines be interpreted as altering or superseding the existing authorities of the Secretary of Commerce, Director of the OMB, or any other federal official. This publication may be used by nongovernmental organizations on a voluntary basis and is not subject to copyright in the United States. Attribution would, however, be appreciated by NIST.

National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-150 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-150, 35 pages (October 2016)

CODEN: NSPUE2

This publication is available free of charge from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-150

Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describ

Rumsfeld v Padilla Discuss the main argument before the US Supreme Court.

Interested in getting help with this assignment?

Recent posts