As a manager, you need to be in charge of your team or department, as well as confronting and solving problems. There are many ways to develop experience as a manager beyond formal tra

Environmental Challenges Caused by Extensive use of Face Masks and its Possible Management Solutions.

My research paper writing help for this independent student project focuses on the environmental challenges caused by the extensive use of face masks during the recent worldwide pandemic. The project looks at the environmental challenges these face masks have brought to the environment and the possible solutions to curb these challenges. The main reason for choosing this topic is since the face mask usage began, the environment has faced a challenge due to poor disposal of these face masks. There has been increased plastic pollution in the atmosphere recently due to inadequate removal of face masks and their production, which results in carbon dioxide emissions in the background. Increased carbon in the air causes global warming. Face covers add immense amounts of plastic, and plastic molecules squander in the climate, which might wind up in the roads and landfills. In addition, it gets into the streams and arrives at the new marine water. This adds the presence of plastics into the sea-going medium. However, this project will provide proof of existing environmental challenges due to the extensive use of face masks and give some potential solutions. The significant points I will consider in this project include: the various challenges that face masks have on the environment, which involve the water bodies, air pollution, animals, soils, and human health. Further, the project will consider possible solutions to these environmental challenges.

Some of the challenges I will face involve insufficient literature on the research topic since it is one of the recent topics in environmental and resource management. The ecological challenges caused by face masks’ extensive usage may affect only a few regions since I am not sure if all other areas across the globe face the same challenges; therefore, the challenges and solutions may be regional biased.

Assignment Two

Annotated Bibliography

Saltmarsh, Abigail. “Face Masks: New Solutions to Reduce Their Negative Impact on the Environment – MedicalExpo E-Magazine.”  MedicalExpo E-Magazine, 30 Jan. 2021, emag.medicalexpo.com/face-masks-new-solutions-to-reduce-their-negative-impact-on-the-environment/.

The article above provides some of the solutions for reducing the negative impacts that poor disposal of face masks has on our environment. The report offers different solutions which help curb the environmental challenges currently affecting most countries globally and some difficulties brought by the extensive use of face masks. The author offers challenges such as increased carbon emission and water pollution. Some solutions include zero waste, biodegradable options, and the creation of protective gears. Zero wastes involve strategies such as the creation of zero-waste boxes for the collection of all used face masks and taking them for recycling. Biodegradable options involve organic materials like cotton, hemp face coverings, linen, and bamboo. The article states that hemp face covering is currently being encouraged globally for usage. The author also gives some information about transparent Hellomasks, which can filter out viruses and bacteria. They are also breathable and allow for facial expressions. The article further provides a solution for the creation of protective gears where the author says that recycling is among the best solutions to avoid face mask environmental challenges. Although the article has provided the major points I was searching, the authors may provide regional bias information. I recommend this article for any organization or state currently facing any environmental challenge brought by the extensive usage of face masks due to the recent pandemic

Assignment 3

Before reading any text, there are various reading stages involved. However, I experienced the different reading stages while researching the environmental challenges that emerged due to the extensive usage of face masks and the potential solutions. At first, I had set out the purpose of reading the text where I focused on two main points: the environmental challenges and the possible explanations for the extensive usage of face masks. These were the significant points that could impact my perspective and change my understanding for a long-term period about the environmental challenges that the recent pandemic has caused and the successful solutions that have already been applied as well as some of the suggested solutions. The long-term effects of the article include furthering my research on specific topics like how water bodies are polluted through extensive usage of face masks, how face masks lead to global warming and the best solutions for these problems. During the reading stage, taking short notes on the key points would be essential but a short-term practice. This allowed finding answers to the main research topic. After reading, I now combine my understanding before and after reading the text. The combination of these ideas has a long-term effect on my knowledge of the environmental challenges induced due to the extensive mask usage and potential solutions. Short-term effects of reading the article include getting knowledge about the number and the names of the authors who participated in writing the article. The author's name will only have a short-term effect.

Nonetheless, the authors are essential people, but they are just the people who wrote the text. My main focus concerns the environmental challenges due to the extensive usage of face masks and solutions to reducing these problems. Other short-term effects include the website from which the article is found.

There are some problems I faced while reading through the text. During the reading process, I experienced comprehension problems. I read the text several times to get the main points concerning the environmental challenges due to the long-term usage of face masks and the solutions. At some point, I could lose track of differentiating the key and the challenge, creating a huge problem. I kept asking myself questions like; how do face masks develop issues in the environment? How are these problems being curbed? Such questions helped differentiate the problems and solutions of the research topic while taking short notes on significant points.

Through the reading, I could link the challenges and the possible solutions to those environmental challenges. Challenges like face masks appearing scattered within the streets and the landfills had a solution for creating TerraCycle's, which are used for collecting used plastic face masks and taking them for recycling. Soil pollution could be managed through organic materials like cotton and linen, which can readily decompose in the soil when disposed of. The text presents some ideas from my experience, like the scattering of face masks in the streets. Lately, I have encountered this unpleasant view within my hometown, making the city look dirty and unorganized. The article creates a mental image of the impacts of Covid-19 on the environment. Reading the text, I think the author is much more uncomfortable with the various environmental challenges that face masks bring, which leads to identifying the ecological challenges and the potential solutions for those challenges.

I think the article's author wrote the text for organizations and governments that have difficulty coping with environmental challenges that face masks have on their environments. This is because the text provided the solutions for managing used face masks in our environment and reducing ecological threats like global warming, health risks, soil pollution, and animal risks. Environmental conservation is the central ideology of the text. Environmental conservation is one of the essential parts of our lives since it protects man's existence, animals, and plant life. It makes the world an excellent place to live. Since environmental problems are continuous and emerge due to different situations, ecological conservation is essential to provide solutions to emerging environmental challenges.

From the text, I have realized that there are some topics about which I have little knowledge and where I require further reading. Areas like the use of Helpmask are new terminologies, which need more understanding on what they are made of and how they filter viruses and bacteria. I also realized that I could read a text fluently but struggled to track the content consistently. I have to keep reading essay help severally to have a clear understanding. Moreover, I realized that I have difficulty reading large text where I found it tiresome, while the tendency to lose track was higher with large text than with short texts. However, to productively read the text, I kept questioning myself and summarizing the text.

Assignment Four

Blueprint

Covid-19 emergence has brought out various environmental challenges recently experienced due to the extensive usage of face masks where possible solutions are in need. Poor disposal of used face masks can lead to adverse ecological challenges globally, but its effects can be curbed. Used face masks lead to water pollution where aquatic animals may consume the masks leading to the death of the animals, while this can be managed through recycling and reusing masks. The production of face masks leads to carbon dioxide emissions into the air, which contributes to global warming. This can be reduced by producing washable face masks and building mask incineration plants while using biodegradable materials in manufacturing masks. Face mask waste leads to plastic pollution where used face masks are found in every part of the street and landfills; this challenge can be managed by adopting Hellomasks.

Poor disposal of used face masks has led to water pollution. When used masks are disposed into the water bodies, aquatic animals may confuse them with food and consume them with waste masks (Aragaw). Marine animals consuming these waste masks may cause problems like reduced to no reproduction, affecting digestion, and weakening their immune system. All these threats can lead to the death of the animals hence an environmental problem. When used face masks are released or disposed into the water bodies, they contaminate the water bodies and water sources (Li, Bing, et al.). Waste masks are pollutants to the water since they can be channels for further spreading the virus through the water. This increases the health risks for people consuming the water as they can easily contract the virus. However, water pollution can be managed by reusing face masks and recycling the used masks instead of throwing them into the water bodies. Therefore it can be concluded that poor disposal of used face masks leads to environmental challenges within the water bodies.

Irresponsible disposal of used face masks leads to increased release of Carbon dioxide into the air, which causes global warming. The texture, sewing, and the weaving cycle of material cover manufacture contribute to the CO2 discharge in the conditions (Saltmarsh). Production of a single mask emits a total of 50 grams of carbon. Transportation by trucks of used face masks to the disposal areas like incineration plants increases carbon emissions (Prata, Joana C., et al. 31). Large amounts of poorly disposed used covers lead to large numbers of trucks transporting the used masks to the recycling plants; hence large amounts of carbon emissions to the air show global warming. These can be managed by producing washable covers, increasing the number of incineration plants, and using renewable materials for manufacturing face masks. To summarize, poor disposal of face masks leads to increased release of carbon into the air during production and transportation, which increase global warming.

Poor disposal of used face masks leads to plastic pollution within the street and landfills. Improper disposal of waste masks is currently found on most roads, especially in the towns where they pose health risks (Selvaranjan et al.). When used, face masks are disposed of carelessly in the streets; they form breeding sites for dangerous insects like mosquitoes which causes diseases. Careless disposal of used face masks leads to landfills which negatively impact the environment (Du et al.,). Landfills produce carbon dioxide and water fume and follow measures of oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, and non-methane natural mixtures. These gases can likewise add to environmental change and make exhaust clouds whenever left uncontrolled. However, this can be adequately managed by adopting Hellomask, which is readily biodegradable when buried. Improper disposal of used face masks leads to plastic pollution, an environmental hazard.

Poor disposal of used face masks leads to increased environmental challenges, which have possible solutions that can help curb the situation. Challenges like global warming due to increased carbon emissions can be managed by producing washable face masks and increasing the number of incineration plants. On the other hand, water pollution can be controlled by reusing face masks. Waste masks have also led to dirty and unconducive environments that pose health risks. Organic materials in the production of face masks help reduce waste masks' effects on landfills. Despite the opposing environmental challenges that Covid-19 brought globally, everyone is responsible for keeping the environment safe from ecological hazards through proper disposal and utilization of renewable resources in producing face masks that have zero adverse effects on the environment.

Assignment Five

Environmental Challenges Caused by Extensive use of Face Masks and its Possible Management Solutions.

The recent pandemic has caused more harm to our environment than the good things it has done for the same. Various environmental challenges are currently faced by most regions globally due to the improper disposal of face masks. Most face masks are made of non-renewable materials, which, when disposed of poorly in the environment, cause more harm to the environment. Poor disposal of used face masks leads to adverse environmental effects, which can be managed by implementing different solutions. Some of these environmental challenges include water pollution, increased carbon emissions that cause water pollution, and increased plastic pollution. However, these challenges can be managed through recycling and reusing masks, increasing incineration plants, usage of biodegradable materials for producing masks, and placement of TerraCycle for disposing of used face masks.

Poor disposal of used face masks has led to water pollution. When the face mask is transferred to streams and enters fresh water and seawater (Aragaw), plastic contaminates the seabed. Marine plastic advertises toxins and foreign substances, which ensures contaminant particles, binding like a harmful film to the outer layer of plastic. Next, it is also possible to harm plastic creatures that eat plastic. Imported plastic can impair youth circulation, development, and the development of the mask while re-applying and applying a face mask. Poor disposal of used face masks negatively affects water bodies since it creates fatalities to aquatic animals and water contamination by further spreading the Further, it can cause snare, leading to oceanic fauna like birds and other submerged creatures. Fracture of the full-scale plastic in the veil could happen due to different abiotic factors like photodegradation, enduring, consumption, and amphibian submersion framing the optional miniature plastics. Consequently, bio aggregation of such microplastic happens in the significant food web of human life and causes the gathering of poisons. When used masks are disposed of in the water bodies, they contaminate water by making them unhealthy for usage. Infected masks can spread the virus through the water (Li, Bing, et al.). Covid-19 spread through different channels like surfaces, water, and even air. Therefore, when masks are disposed of or released into any water body, it spreads the virus when other people use the contaminated water. However, this challenge can be managed by encouraging biodegradable materials to produce face virus.

Irresponsible disposal of used face masks leads to increased release of Carbon dioxide into the air, which causes global warming. Face masks produce large amounts of carbon in the air, which leads to global warming (Saltmarsh). The cycles of propylene, little aluminum strips, and polypropylene in creating N95 and surgical masks contribute to the critical measure of CO2 discharge to the conditions. The N95 veil creation discharges 50 g CO2-eq in each single mask, barring the transportation cycle. Surgical masks are epitomized with 59 g CO2-eq for each mask. While the mask creation contributes around 60 g CO2-eq ozone harming substance discharge per single veil. Nonetheless, this would have a massive effect on the environment since many facial coverings are delivered worldwide to control what is happening. A review was directed in the UK and broke down that assuming every individual purpose one dispensable careful veil consistently for a year; this would make a total of one hundred and twenty four thousand tons of unrecyclable plastic waste, 66,000 tons of tainted squander, and fifty seven thousand tons of plastic bundling. Currently, there is no particular waste stream for these items, assuming it is utilized by general society. Trucks that transport used masks to incineration plants emit large amounts of carbon into the air (Prata, Joana C., et al. 31). Due to the large amounts of poorly disposed of used masks, there are large numbers of trucks that transport these masks for recycling. Trucks release carbon into the air, adversely affecting the environment through global warming. Effects of global warming include rising water bodies which affect people living within the coastal areas, insufficient rainfall within the mainland, which leads to a shortage of food supplies, and the destruction of the ozone layer, increasing health risks. However, these effects can be managed by encouraging washable masks. Washable masks allow the public to reuse their face masks for a long time, reducing the environmental effects of used masked disposal. An increase in incineration plants is another strategy that can be used to manage used face masks. Incineration is a waste treatment process that includes burning substances in squander materials. Modern plants for squander burning are generally alluded to as waste-to-energy offices. Further, biodegradable materials can be used for manufacturing face masks. Biodegradable masks are a cutting-edge economical elective choice to lessen the cover that actuates plastic waste. Polypropylene coating can be replaced by natural and perishable material with similar mechanical, visible, and composite properties such as lightweight, high durability, physical protection, low cost, etc., high strength damaged. Biodegradable polymers as well as bioplastics may be an alternative to polypropylene. Bioplastic is a type of biodegradable plastic than conventional oil-based plastic. The construction of the mask using bioplastics should take into account the requirements of the guide, for example, flexibility, waterproofing, and fragmented structures. As a general rule, this mass of structures can be found in bioplastic due to the presence of polypropylene. This perishable plastic reduces CO2 emissions by 70% compared to conventional (Saltmarsh). Decomposing polymers can be found in various families such as the creation of biomass from agro materials such as polysaccharides (starch), lipids, and proteins. Common threads such as barley, banana, lotus, grass, corn stalk, hemp, sisal, espresso, and sugar stick can meet the general requirements for bringing the mask. In conclusion, the production of face masks leads to an increase in carbon dioxide emissions, which in turn leads to global warming.

Poor disposal of used face masks leads to plastic pollution within the street and landfills. Most urban centers globally have unpleasant looks due to the poorly disposed of used face masks, which pose health risks (Selvaranjan et al.). Poorly disposed of used masks collect some water during a rain season. Water collected by used masks form dangerous mosquito breeding sites. Although some regions are not affected severely by Malaria, developing countries still face a significant challenge in treating and generally dealing with the illness. Landfills also threaten the environment due to poorly disposed of used masks. A landfill is where waste products like used masks are buried under the soil (Du et al.). Burying used face masks is a significant threat to the environment since the materials used in making the masks are non-organic. When these non-organic materials are buried in the soil, they release greenhouse gases, methane, and toxins into the environment leading to environmental change. Landfills also contribute to the contamination of water. When rainwater passes through a landfill, it forms leachate, contaminating the ground and nearby water sources. It can also transmit the virus through contaminated water to people using and using the nearby water sources. An alternative way of using organic masks, such as Hellomasks, is the best option to manage this environmental challenge. Hellomasks are transparent masks that can decompose when either thrown carelessly or buried under the soil. These kinds of masks are breathable and can filter viruses and bacteria. Since they readily decompose, these masks reduce the effects of global warming and water contamination, forming a good option for adoption. Plastic pollution is a significant environmental challenge due to poorly disposed used masks.

Improper disposal of used masks causes environmental challenges, which can be managed through possible solutions. These challenges include global warming, water pollution, and plastic pollution. However, these environmental challenges can be managed through recycling and reusing face masks, encouraging the usage of organic materials for producing face masks, and adopting Hellomasks. Each individual's responsibility is to protect the environment despite the emergence of the pandemic since everyone suffers the effect of environmental problems globally; thus, proper disposal and using renewable resources help reduce the effects of used face masks in the environment.

Works Cited

Aragaw, Tadele Assefa. "Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario."  Marine Pollution Bulletin 159 (2020): 111517.

Du, Hao, Shushi Huang, and Jun Wang. "Environmental risks of polymer materials from disposable face masks linked to the COVID-19 pandemic."  Science of The Total Environment (2022): 152980.

Li, Bing, et al. "Environmental risks of disposable face masks during the pandemic of COVID- 19: Challenges and management."  Science of the Total Environment 825 (2022): 153880. https://profsonly.com/research-paper-writing-help/

‌ Prata, Joana C., et al. "Disposable over reusable face masks: Public safety or environmental disaster?."  Environments 8.4 (2021): 31.

Saltmarsh, Abigail. “Face Masks: New Solutions to Reduce Their Negative Impact on the Environment – MedicalExpo E-Magazine.”  MedicalExpo E-Magazine, 30 Jan. 2021, emag.medicalexpo.com/face-masks-new-solutions-to-reduce-their-negative-impact-on-the-environment/.

Selvaranjan, Kajanan, et al. “Environmental Challenges Induced by Extensive Use of Face Masks during COVID-19: A Review and Potential Solutions.”  Environmental Challenges, vol. 3, Apr. 2021, p. 100039, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100039.