Discussion Thread: Theoretical Conceptualization
Provide a theoretical conceptualization of the conflict that you will be analyzing for your paper. Your thread should focus on the conceptualization, and will be a much shorter summary of the document you will turn in for the Conflict Resolution: Part 2 – Literature Review and Conceptualization Assignment. Your post will allow feedback from your colleagues regarding any parts of the conceptualization you may not have thought of. Must include Bible perspectives.
500 word count
Due by 10a.m. Tuesday September 19, 2023. NO LATE WORK!!!!
PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENTS!!!!
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Thread
21 to >19.0 pts
Advanced
• Original post displays clear content mastery and relates precisely to the assigned topic. • Original post is balanced in their approach to the topic but provide evidence of a clear, well-researched position on the topic.
19 to >17.0 pts
Proficient
• Original post is related to the assigned topic but does not provide evidence of subject mastery. • Original post is mostly balanced but does not provide evidence of a firm position derived from research or current literature.
17 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Original post is loosely related to the assigned topic and does not effectively contribute to the development of the discussion. Posts display a minimal or superficial understanding of the topic. • Original post shows a clear bias or does not provide a discernable position on the issue. Evidence of research is not present.
0 pts
Not Present
21 pts
Content
Reply
21 to >19.0 pts
Advanced
• Reply posts display a collegial conversation that moves the conversation forward with evidence of content mastery within the context of a reply type post. • Replies are balanced in their approach to the topic but provide evidence of a clear, well-researched position on the topic within the context of a reply post (less rigor than an original post).
19 to >17.0 pts
Proficient
• Reply posts display a collegial conversation that generally moves the conversation forward but do not provide evidence of subject mastery within the context of a reply post. • Reply posts are mostly balanced but do not provide evidence of a firm position derived from research or current literature within the context of a reply post (less rigor than an original post).
17 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Reply post is loosely related to the context of the other student’s post. However, there is no attempt to move the conversation forward. Posts display a minimal or superficial understanding of the topic. • Reply posts show a clear bias or do not provide a discernable position on the issue. Evidence of research is not present within the context of a reply post (less rigor than an original post).
0 pts
Not Present
21 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure
Grammar, Spelling & Format
9 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Correct spelling and grammar used throughout essay. Post contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • Minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format. • This section must be balanced in the “spirit of APA” as Canvas discussions create internal formatting errors.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
• Post contains fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • Few errors (3-4) were noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format. • This section must be balanced in the “spirit of APA” as Canvas discussions create internal formatting errors.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Posts contain fewer than 8 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • Numerous errors (5+) were noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format. • This section must be balanced in the “spirit of APA” as Canvas discussions create internal formatting errors.
0 pts
Not Present
9 pts
Structure
Word Length
9 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Minimum word count of 500 words for the initial thread. Initial post includes three unique, relevant scholarly reference and one scriptural reference. • Minimum word count of 250 words for each reply thread. Each reply post includes one unique, relevant scholarly reference and one scriptural reference.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
• Minimum word count for each post is within 10% of the requirement. References to outside sources are included but may be two or fewer, and the scriptural reference may be omitted. • Minimum word count for each reply post is within 10% of the requirement. References to outside sources are included and relevant but may not be scholarly sources, and the scriptural reference may be omitted.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Minimum word count for each post is within 20% of the requirement. Sources referenced are not scholarly or relevant. The scriptural reference is omitted. • Minimum word count for each reply post is within 20% of the requirement. Sources referenced are not scholarly or relevant. The scriptural reference is omitted.
0 pts
Not Present
9 pts
Total Points: 60
Discussion Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340