CONFLICT RESOLUTION: PART 4 – PROPOSAL ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
This Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Assignment is a combination of the papers
developed from your three previous Conflict Resolution Assignments. Yes, you will use much,
if not all of the material you have used from your previous papers in this class – and you have
specific permission to use the past papers for this Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal
Assignment paper. The sections developed in the first three Conflict Resolution Assignments
should be consolidated into one paper which has effective transitions and flows together.
PLEASE READ ATTACHMENTS!!!!
CJUS 830
Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Assignment Instructions
Due by 10a.m. Thursday October 5, 2023. NO LATE WORK!!!!
Overview
This Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Assignment is a combination of the papers developed from your three previous Conflict Resolution Assignments. Yes, you will use much, if not all of the material you have used from your previous papers in this class – and you have specific permission to use the past papers for this Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Assignment paper. The sections developed in the first three Conflict Resolution Assignments should be consolidated into one paper which has effective transitions and flows together. You should have a specific section in the Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Assignment paper dedicated to a synthesis of Christian Worldview and their topic. Ideas for your Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Assignment paper are included below. Although I expect you to cover the areas below, at a minimum, you may or may not choose to use the same format. In fact you may prefer a more detailed approach or wish to rearrange/rename the main or sub-topics.
Instructions
Items to include are outlined as follows:
· Length of assignment is 25 to 30 pages
· Excluding title page, abstract, reference section, or any extra material
· Format of assignment is the current version of APA
· Number of citations – Minimum guideline is 25 – 35 peer reviewed academic journal articles and at least one Holy Bible reference.
FORMATTING IDEAS
Introduction
Conflict Description
a. Problem Description
b. Detailed Background
c. Examples of the Conflict Manifestation
d. Previous Examples of Efforts to Resolve the Conflict or Evidence that there has Never Been an Effort to Resolve the Conflict
Literature Review and Conceptualization
e. Literature Related to Conflict _ if applicable
f. Literature Related to Conflict Resolution Applicable to Your Project
g. Literature Related to Theoretical Approach Chosen for Resolution
h. Any other Salient Research Related to Your Project
i. Conceptualization of How You Will Use Sound Conflict Resolution Theories and Concepts to Resolve Your Conflict
Action Plan
j. Application of Theories and Principles
k. Specific Plan of Action
l. How Suggested Intervention Will Cause a Change to the Underlying Conflict Dynamic
m. Effect of Action Plan on Parties of the Conflict
The Need and Uses of Criminal Justice Conflict Resolution
Christian Worldview
n. Application to Conflict Resolution – General
o. Application to You Plan – Specific
Any Other Salient Sections
Your paper will be checked by Turnitin for plagiarism.
Page 2 of 2
,
Criteria Ratings Points
Content 45 to >40 pts
Advanced
The topic is clearly presented and discussed in detail. Key terms are defined as needed. Complex issues are navigated with precision.
40 to >37 pts
Proficient
The topic is presented and discussed appropriately. Key terms are defined as needed. Complex issues are recognized.
37 to >0 pts
Developing
The topic is unclear or fairly clear but discussed too broadly or does not meet expectations. Contextual factors are weakly considered and lacking in some significant areas. Complex issues are overlooked or handled without care.
0 pts
Not Present
45 pts
Content 45 to >40 pts
Advanced
Successfully and with precision bridges the gap between the theory of conflict resolution and the practice of resolving conflict. Provides proper application of theories and concepts to a specific action plan with an appreciation of the intended change and intended effect of parties of the conflict.
40 to >37 pts
Proficient
Generally, bridges the gap between the theory of conflict resolution and the practice of resolving conflict. Provides ideas of theories and concepts of conflict resolution and applies the theories with a general action plan. Discusses, without great detail the intended change and intended effect of parties of the conflict.
37 to >0 pts
Developing
Discusses theories applicable to conflict resolution and discusses a conflict resolution plan in general. Does little to synthesize theory or practice together.
0 pts
Not Present
45 pts
Content 45 to >40 pts
Advanced
Sources are evaluated critically for applicability in the paper. The review of literature is strong. The action plan is strong. The conclusion is strong and clearly summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper.
40 to >37 pts
Proficient
Sources are used correctly. The conclusion summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper. The review of literature is good. The action plan is written in general terms. The conclusion is generally good and generally summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper.
37 to >0 pts
Developing
Sources are used but not critically evaluated. The action plan is not based upon an evaluation of information. The conclusion does not adequately summarize the research presented in the body of the paper.
0 pts
Not Present
45 pts
Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340
Criteria Ratings Points
Content 33 to >29 pts
Advanced
Creates Christian Worldview (CWV) Section and applies CWV elements and support in explanation of the training program with specific biblical references (book, chapter, and verse).
29 to >27 pts
Proficient
Creates Christian Worldview (CWV) Section and applies general CWV elements and support in explanation of the training program with global referencing to biblical references (reference does not have book, chapter, and verse, rather, “the Bible says type of references).
27 to >0 pts
Developing
Christian Worldview (CWV) mentioned. No specific section in the paper. Only general CWV elements and support in explanation of the training program with global referencing to biblical references (reference does not have book, chapter, and verse, rather, “the Bible says type of references).
0 pts
Not Present
33 pts
Structure 24 to >21 pts
Advanced
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. Student has proper page count. Twenty-five to Thirty pages (or more if page count waived by instructor) not including title page, abstract, or reference section.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate. Student has 70% of the proper page count of Twenty-five pages not including title page, abstract, or reference section.
19 to >0 pts
Developing
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. Student has less than 70% of the proper page count of Twenty-five pages not including title page, abstract, or reference section.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure 24 to >21 pts
Advanced
Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.
19 to >0 pts
Developing
Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure 24 to >21 pts
Advanced
Academic primary and .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 25 citations as listed below. Research may incorporate multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate reference section is provided. Arguments are correctly supported with research.
Standard: A minimum of 25 citations (25 to 35 recommended ): 15 to 20 recent (past 10 years unless waived by professor), relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. However, professional journals (no more than 50%) and .gov references may be used for this requirement. No more than 4 books. Must use at least one Holy Bible reference (more suggested). Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non-academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 25 citations.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues.
Academic primary and .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 70% of the required 25 citations as listed below. Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate reference section is provided. Arguments are correctly supported with research.
Standard: A minimum of 25 citations (25 to 35 recommended ): 15 to 20 recent (past 10 years unless waived by professor), relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. However, professional journals (no more than 50%) and .gov references may be used for this requirement. No more than 4 books. Must use at least one Holy Bible reference (more suggested). Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non-academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 25 citations.
19 to >0 pts
Developing
Less than 70% of the Academic sources required 25 citations as listed below are used. Reliance on popular sources is evident. Arguments incorporate limited research but often include personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are, at times, not used appropriately. Research is not aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate reference section is provided.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Total Points: 240
Conflict Resolution: Part 4 – Proposal Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340