Using your same chosen group you will need to either attend a cultural event or advocacy event for your chosen group OR interview someone within your chosen group
©
Points: 100 Overview: Using your same chosen group you will need to either attend a cultural event or advocacy event for your chosen group OR interview someone within your chosen group. Examples of events include a cultural demonstration, a religious ritual/ceremony, a gay pride event, or domestic violence awareness event. Instructions: With either option you will need to write a 2 page reaction paper that describes your experiences at the event or speaking with the individual. You should be describing your experiences with specific detail which includes a description of the event or individual’s story, why it was important, what you learned, and how it contributes to better understanding your chosen group. Please use examples to illustrate what you mention. Requirements:
• This paper should include at least 3 outside resources that provide context to your event or interview or help to further illustrate the importance of the event or what your interviewee states.
• The paper should be 2 full pages in length (not including the title or reference
pages).
• Please be sure to avoid using internet sources such as Wikipedia or other web- based resources that do not have strong academic backing. You will also be required to use in-text references in your work in accordance with APA style to avoid plagiarism. Plagiarism detection software will be used to scan each paper and any paper that is determined to have academic integrity issues will earn a score of 0 automatically. Any papers that have been submitted in other courses will NOT be accepted. This must be original work. Self-plagiarism and any other forms of plagiarism will result in one or all of the following actions: 1) 0 for the assignment 2) failing the course 3) dismissal from the university.
Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.
HSV320 – Multicultural Issues in Human Services
Unit 5 Assignment: Written Assignment 2
©
Evaluation Rubric for Assignments
CRITERIA Deficient Needs Improvement
Proficient Exemplary
0-23 24-27 28-30 31-33
Structure
Organization structure and
paragraphing have serious and
persistent errors. Directions were
ignored and information
provided was insufficient to meet
assignment guidelines.
Written work inadequate for college-level
work; Paragraphing and transitions are inadequate;
inappropriate guidelines outlined for
paper were not met with several problems (see
directions).
Written work is clear and adequate
college-level work;
Paragraphing and transitions
are adequate;
appropriate guidelines outlined for paper were met with a few noted
problems (see directions).
Written work is clear and excellent
college-level work;
Paragraphing and transitions
are clear and
appropriate; appropriate guidelines outlined
for paper were met (see
directions).
0-23 24-27 28-30 31-33
Mechanics
Written work had serious and
persistent errors in word selection and
use; sentence structure, spelling,
grammar, punctuation was
inappropriate and with serious errors; APA style was
completely unacceptable.
Written work had serious and persistent errors
in word selection and
use; sentence structure, spelling,
grammar, punctuation was
inappropriate and with serious
errors; APA style was
completely unacceptable.
Written work was generally
free of errors in word selection
and use; sentence
structure, spelling,
grammar, punctuation
was adequate; APA
style was acceptable with a few
errors.
Written work has no major
errors in word selection
and use; sentence structure, spelling,
grammar, punctuation
was appropriate;
APA style was acceptable
with no to few errors
©
0-23 24-27 28-30 31-34
Content
Written work does not cover the
assigned topic; assertions
are not supported by
evidence; paper is seriously lacking in content and detail; scholarly journals were not used or
used properly.
Written work does not do an
adequate job of covering the assigned
topic; assertions are
weakly supported by
evidence; paper is inadequate in
meeting the page and
content area requirements;
less than 3 scholarly
journals were used.
The length of the written
work is sufficient to
cover the topic; assertions are supported by
evidence; does not meet full
required number of pages and
content areas. 3 scholarly
journals were used.
The length of the written
work provides in-
depth coverage of
the topics,
assertions are clearly
supported by evidence;
Paper meets required length
of pages and
content areas; 3 or more scholarly
journals were used.