Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Discuss, in depth, one of the steps identified in the five-step process for public fire safety education: identification, selection, design, implementation, and evaluation. - Writingforyou

Discuss, in depth, one of the steps identified in the five-step process for public fire safety education: identification, selection, design, implementation, and evaluation.

  Please answer each question in a complete paragraph followed by a reference. Please respond to each question separately. All questions need to be answered in full complete sentences. Please only answer three questions per page  Please do not make the paragraph full of cited information the paragraphs must be at least 8 sentences long. only 3 questions per page answered.  

1

Q1

Discuss, in depth, one of the steps identified in the five-step process for public fire safety education: identification, selection, design, implementation, and evaluation.

Q2

Hazard adjustments assume that people live with a certain degree of threats that can be prevented or mitigated through certain actions. Pick three hazards that are prevalent in your hometown of elizabeth city NC. What hazard adjustments would you recommend based on these three hazards?

Q3

Last week we saw a TED talk by Guy Kawaski on Enchantment. In one area of his talk, he covered some great tips on how to effectively use presentations.  This week we'll take a look at another presentation, this time by Vanessa Van Edwards

Did you ever why some TED talks go viral? Or why do some seem to be better than others? Are communication signals contagious? Vanessa Van Edwards reveals some very interesting insights in this area.  Take note of how she describes the use of hands and gestures that we use as well as conversation starters (and killers as well).

Think about some of the hints offered the next time you engage with others. After the video and during this week, I'd really like each of you to incorporate some of her ideas into your daily life and see if there are any changes.   These can be practical exercises of Human Relations.

Questions to answer in this week's discussion.

1. What was the most enlightening part of the talk? What really stood out to you? 

2. Have you ever done any of the conversation killers that she discussed?

3. What specific actions would you take to utilize some of her recommendations? 

4. If you changed anything about yourself this week based on her talk what were some of your observations? 

Video  Link  

Q4

Part I There are various identification methods used in the criminal justice system. There are also two different types of evidence used: physical evidence and circumstantial evidence. This discussion examines the reliability of the various methods used and examines the two different types of evidence.

Please discuss each of the following:

1. Discuss the various identification methods used in the criminal justice system. Discuss some of the flaws with eye witness identifications?

2. What is the difference between physical evidence and circumstantial evidence? Which do you believe is more reliable to a jury? 

3. What are some of the benefits and drawbacks to relying on DNA evidence in a criminal case?

Part II

Please review the two signed statements from witnesses. One is from Dawn Dietz, the prosecutor's witness, and the other is from Joe "The Fireman", the defense's witness. Using these two witness statements and the facts provided to you in the week 1 discussion, answer the following questions:

1) If you were the prosecutor, how would you discredit the potential testimony of Joe The Fireman?

2) If you were the defense attorney, how would you discredit the potential testimony of Dawn Dietz?

3)  What statements/testimony from the witnesses, the police officer and Mayo will be admissible and inadmissible? Discuss why.

Q5

Your character is in support of support gradual emancipation

Please remember this debate take place during the 1850s.  Before the Civil War, before Emancipation Proclamation and after Jefferson has been dead for more than 35 years.

The required work will help you.   Who will you be in the debate?   Your character does not have to be an actual historical figure. You can be, for example, journalist, politician, teacher, a domestic servant or a sharecropper. Just make sure that you ground your analysis in academic sources and you demonstrate you have done all the required work by integrating it into your debate positions.   Stay in character for your responses means if you say you are a certain name than each response should have this person's name or that of the person your are corresponding with in each response is part of the debating.   Also no modern day history facts should be used…in this debate Lincoln is still alive…meaning discussing the Emancipation Proclamation is not appropriate but the rumor of it can be discussed…remember the Emancipation Proclamation was a gradual emancipation document because it only freed slaves in the Confederate states but allowed Union states to still continue slavery.

Q6