Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Discuss below questions based on attached case study PART A 1) What ?were ?the ?Top ?3? ?capability ?strengths ?for ?i-??AM, ?Inc.? ?Top ?3? ?weaknesses? ?Describe ?an ?example ?of - Writingforyou

Discuss below questions based on attached case study PART A 1) What ?were ?the ?Top ?3? ?capability ?strengths ?for ?i-??AM, ?Inc.? ?Top ?3? ?weaknesses? ?Describe ?an ?example ?of

Discuss below questions based on attached case study

PART A

1) What  were  the  “Top  3”  capability  strengths  for  i-­‐AM,  Inc.?  “Top  3”  weaknesses?  Describe  an  example  of  each  strength  and  weakness.  

2) Based  on  the  resilience  gaps  computed  by  the  SCRAM  tool,  are  there  any  patterns  that  i-­‐AM,  Inc.,  can  use  to  their  advantage?  

PART B

1) Compute  the  recommended  safety  stock  and  re-­‐order  point  for  a  continuous  review  inventory  system,  using  actual  data  from  December  2012,  given  i-­‐AM,  Inc.’s  goal  of  a  95%  service  level.  

2) Determine  which  supplier  or  suppliers  should  be  used  for  2013  and  beyond.  Consider  both  financial  and  resilience  aspects  of  this  recommendation.  

Council  of  Supply  Chain  Management  Professionals   333  East  Butterfield  Road,  Suite  140   Lombard,  Illinois  60148  USA   +1  630.574.0985    |    [email protected]    |    cscmp.org  

                     

CSCMP  ACADEMIC  CASE  STUDY  SERIES      

Case  studies  can  supplement  a  course  and  be  used  to  teach  application  of  supply  chain   management  concepts  to  real-­‐world  situations.  Others  can  use  the  case  studies  to  learn   about  supply  chain  challenges  and  to  analyze  the  situation  to  develop  solutions.      

Supply  Chain  Resilience:   A  Case  of  Balancing  the  Supply  Chain   for  Long-­‐term  Sustainability   An  Academic  Learning  Case  Study  written  for  the   Council  of  Supply  Chain  Management  Professionals  

By:   Lieutenant  Colonel  Timothy  J.  Pettit,  PhD   U.S.  Air  Force  Academy  [email protected]  

The  views  expressed  in  this  article  are  those  of  the  authors  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  official   policy  or  position  of  the  Air  Force,  the  Department  of  Defense,  or  the  U.S.  Government.  

   

   

This  document  is  available  from  our  site  and  provided  for  your  personal  use  only  and  may  not  be  retransmitted  or  redistribute  d  without  written  permission  from  the   Council  of  Supply  Chain  Management  Professionals  (CSCMP).  You  may  not  upload  any  of  this  site’s  material  to  any  public  server,  online  service,  network,  or  bulletin   board  without  written  permission  from   CSCMP.  

Supply  Chain  Resilience:  Balancing  the  SC  for  Long-­‐term  Sustainability    

 

2  

 

CASE  OVERVIEW  

The  i-­‐AM  Tablet  is  an  evolving  gadget  in  a  world  of  fast-­‐paced  technological  change.  Facing  

a  new  partnership  with  a  major  customer,  the  market  for  the  i-­‐AM  Tablet  is  about  to  explode  on  

the  market.  Jim  MacDonald,  CEO  of  i-­‐AM,  Inc.,  and  his  team  have  effectively  employed  traditional  

risk  management  concepts  over  the  past  two  years  and  they  have  yet  to  face  a  product  recall  or  

distribution  disruption.  However,  with  the  growth  that  Jim  envisions  for  his  company,  he  is  turning  

to  the  evolving  concept  of  Supply  Chain  Resilience  to  focus  his  team  on  proactively  managing  the  

upcoming  change.  

[Note  to  readers:  Concepts  in  this  case  were  developed  in  cooperation  with  The  Dow  

Chemical  Company  and  The  Ohio  State  University.  Details  are  described  in  the  2011  CSCMP  

Innovation  Award  Competition  case  study1,  found  on  the  CSCMP  website  cscmp.org.]  

AUDIENCE  

This  case  incorporates  the  multiple  business  aspects  of  operating  a  firm  as  well  as  the  

interactions  between  supply  chain  partners.  Therefore,  this  case  is  most  appropriate  for  advanced  

undergraduate  business  majors  and  MBA  students.  The  questions  in  Part  B  are  specifically  geared  

toward  the  MBA-­‐level  student.  This  case  should  be  considered  for  capstone  courses  to  take  full  

advantage  of  the  integration  of  a  variety  of  business  concepts.  

LEARNING  OBJECTIVES  

Participants  will:    

-   understand  the  concept  of  resilience  and  its  similarities  and  differences  from  

traditional  risk  management  

   

                                                                                                                1  McIntyre  J.  and  Shannon  Hemmelgarn  (  2011),  “How  one  business  made  its  supply  chain  more  resilient,”  Presentation  for  the  2011   Supply  Chain  Innovation  Award,  Annual  Global  Conference  of  the  Council  of  Supply  Chain  Management  Professionals  (CSCMP),   October  4,  2011,  Philadelphia,  PA.  

This  document  is  available  from  our  site  and  provided  for  your  personal  use  only  and  may  not  be  retransmitted  or  redistribute  d  without  written  permission  from  the   Council  of  Supply  Chain  Management  Professionals  (CSCMP).  You  may  not  upload  any  of  this  site’s  material  to  any  public  server,  online  service,  network,  or  bulletin   board  without  written  permission  from   CSCMP.  

Supply  Chain  Resilience:  Balancing  the  SC  for  Long-­‐term  Sustainability    

 

3  

 

-   appreciate  the  complexity  and  inter-­‐relation  of  managerial  capabilities  in  

establishing  and  maintaining  a  resilient  supply  chain  

-   apply  the  results  of  a  resilience  assessment  to  recommend  managerial  

improvements,  both  toward  increasing  capabilities  and  to  potentially  lower  other  

capabilities  

-   understand  the  process  of  resilience  management  

CURRENT  OPERATIONS  OF  i-­‐AM,  INC.  

Jim  MacDonald  is  the  founder  and  CEO  of  the  tech  start-­‐up  i-­‐AM,  Inc.  His  vision  for  a  new  

breed  of  tablets  will  directly  compete  against  the  evolving  multi-­‐function  e-­‐readers,  booming  

notebooks,  and  smartphones.  Jim’s  business  model  is  to  find  a  niche  market  in  which  to  grow  his  

sales  and  continue  innovation  while  leveraging  supply  chain  relationships  with  major  

manufacturers  in  Asia  and  retail  outlets  in  North  America.  Selling  at  only  $199,  the  first  generation  

i-­‐AM  Tablet  integrated  a  very  long-­‐life  battery  with  an  easy-­‐to-­‐read  8”  screen,  along  with  Wi-­‐Fi  

enabled  web  browsing  and  open-­‐sourced  apps.  Since  the  i-­‐AM  Tablet  was  introduced  2  years  ago,  

sales  have  grown  from  an  introductory  quarter  of  $128,000  to  over  $80M  last  quarter.  Mr.  

MacDonald  projects  that  with  a  new  partnership  with  a  major  cell  phone  carrier  and  the  inclusion  

of  4G  communications  into  the  i-­‐AM  Tablet,  sales  will  greatly  increase  as  customers  replace  

multiple  gadgets  with  a  single  multi-­‐purpose  i-­‐AM  Tablet  device.  

However,  the  road  toward  success  has  not  been  smooth.  The  i-­‐AM  has  faced  multiple,  but  

minor,  supplier  disruptions  throughout  the  past  two  years.  Although  none  have  greatly  impacted  

customer  orders,  Jim’s  plans  to  expand  to  “the  big  leagues”  has  him  worried  about  being  able  to  

continually  maintain  customer  expectations  for  product  quality  and  delivery  schedules.  Meeting  

demand  without  the  burden  of  large  inventories  in  this  fast-­‐paced,  high-­‐technology  market  will  be  

critical  to  the  financial  success  of  i-­‐AM,  Inc.  

 

This  document  is  available  from  our  site  and  provided  for  your  personal  use  only  and  may  not  be  retransmitted  or  redistribute  d  without  written  permission  from  the   Council  of  Supply  Chain  Management  Professionals  (CSCMP).  You  may  not  upload  any  of  this  site’s  material  to  any  public  server,  online  service,  network,  or  bulletin   board  without  written  permission  from   CSCMP.  

Supply  Chain  Resilience:  Balancing  the  SC  for  Long-­‐term  Sustainability    

 

4  

 

THE  APPROACH  FOR  SUCCESS  

Although  the  traditional  concepts  of  risk  management  are  firmly  embedded  in  his  

engineering,  production,  and  logistics  decision  processes,  Jim  wants  to  be  more  proactive  in  

managing  his  company’s  changing  environment.  Therefore,  MacDonald  is  applying  the  concept  of  

Supply  Chain  Resilience  to  his  operations  in  hopes  of  maintaining  financial  success  through  these  

turbulent  times.    

Current  Strengths  –  Risk  management  versus  Resilience  

Since  the  1970s,  risk  analysis  techniques  have  played  a  major  role  in  corporate  decision  

making,  especially  when  combined  with  financial  models2.  In  practice,  risk  management  entails  

examining  all  possible  outcomes  of  a  project  or  process,  then  weighing  the  potential  returns  

against  the  potential  risks  of  the  investment3.  Currently,  the  leading  approach  to  Enterprise  Risk  

Management  comes  from  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  

Commission  (COSO  2004)4.  A  typical  view  of  the  traditional  risk  management  process  is  shown  in  

Figure  1,  depicting  a  continuous  cycle  of  identification  of  hazards,  assessment  of  risks,  analysis  of  

controls,  choosing  controls,  implementing  controls,  and  review.  In  many  applications,  risks  can  be  

quantified  based  on  historical  data,  but  evaluating  risks  typically  requires  assumptions  based  on  

subjective  information  rather  than  hard  facts.    

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                2  Hertz,  David  B.  and  Howard  Thomas  (1983),  “Risk  analysis:  Important  new  tool  for  business  planning,”  Journal  of  Business  Strategy,   Vol.  3,  No.  3,  pp.  23-­‐29.   3  Zsidisin,  George  A.,  Lisa  M.  Ellram,  Joseph  R.  Carter  and  Joseph  L.  Cavinato  (2004),  “An  analysis  of  supply  risk  assessment  techniques,”   International  Journal  of  Physical  Distribution  &  Logistics  Management,  Vol.  34,  No.  5,  pp.  397-­‐413.   4  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  (COSO)  of  the  Treadway  Commission  (2004),  Enterprise  risk  management:  Integrated   framework,  www.coso.org/Publications/ERM/COSO_ERM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf.  

This  document  is  available  from  our  site  and  provided  for  your  personal  use  only  and  may  not  be  retransmitted  or  redistribute  d  without  written  permission  from  the   Council  of  Supply  Chain  Management  Professionals  (CSCMP).  You  may  not  upload  any  of  this  site’s  material  to  any  public  server,  online  service,  network,  or  bulletin   board  without  written  permission  from   CSCMP.  

Supply  Chain  Resilience:  Balancing  the  SC  for  Long-­‐term  Sustainability    

 

5  

 

Figure  1:  Operational  Risk  Management  Process5  

In  assessing  the  risks  at  i-­‐AM,  Inc.  (Step  2  in  Figure  1),  Jim  has  seen  great  benefits  from  

sorting  each  identified  risk  into  3  distinct  categories:  1)  Preventable  risks,  2)  Strategy  risks,  and  3)  

External  risks.  First,  preventable  risks  arise  from  within  the  company  and  are  typically  identified  by  

listing  past  occurrences  and  evaluations  by  expert  insights.  These  risks  should  be  closely  

monitored  and  controlled  using  strict  rules  and  standard  compliance  tools.  However,  strategy  risks  

and  external  risks  require  “distinct  processes  that  encourage  managers  to  openly  discuss  risks  and  

find  cost-­‐effective  ways  to  reduce  the  likelihood  of  risk  events  or  mitigate  their  consequences.”6  

During  Jim’s  recent  brainstorming  session  with  his  senior  managers  and  front-­‐line  employees,  the  

group  sorted  32  identified  risks  into  these  three  categories,  which  turned  out  to  be  very  helpful  in  

completing  the  risk  process  steps  with  a  different  “risk  lens”  for  each  category.  It  was  the  final  

category,  “External  Risks,”  that  really  worried  Jim  MacDonald  and  got  him  focusing  on  his  supply  

chain.  

                                                                                                                5  Manuele,  Fred  A.  (2005),  “Risk  assessment  &  hierarchies  of  control,”  Professional  Safety,  Vol.  50,  No.  5,  pp.  33-­‐39.   6  Kaplan,  Robert  S.,  and  Anette  Mikes  (2012),  “Managing  Risks:  A  New  Framework,”  Harvard  Business  Review  (June  2012),  Vol.  90   No.  6,  pp.  48-­‐60.  

Step 1: Identify Hazards

Step 2: Assess Risks

Step 3: Analyze Controls

Step 4: Determine Controls

Step 5: Implement Controls

Step 6: Supervise and Review

Step 1: Identify Hazards

Step 2: Assess Risks

Step 3: Analyze Controls

Step 4: Determine Controls

Step 5: Implement Controls

Step 6: Supervise and Review

This  document  is  available  from  our  site  and  provided  for  your  personal  use  only  and  may  not  be  retransmitted  or  redistribute  d  without  written  permission  from  the   Council  of  Supply  Chain  Management  Professionals  (CSCMP).  You  may  not  upload  any  of  this  site’s  material  to  any  public  server,  online  service,  network,  or  bulletin   board  without  written  permission  from   CSCMP.  

Supply  Chain  Resilience:  Balancing  the  SC  for  Long-­‐term  Sustainability    

 

6  

 

Figure  2:  Risk  Categories  

Recent  research  has  expanded  the  internal  risk  analysis  to  supply  chain  opportunities  by  

integrating  risk  management  techniques  into  a  comprehensive  supply  chain  risk  management  

program:  management  of  supply,  products,  demand,  and  information.7  Mr.  MacDonald  has  been  

very  impressed  with  his  staff’s  implementation  of  risk  management  over  the  past  two  years.  One  

example  of  what  has  helped  him  “sleep  better  at  night”  was  the  purchase  of  an  electrical  generator  

to  avoid  potentially  disastrous  effects  of  an  extended  power  outage.  His  design  manager,  Jeanie  

Johnston,  had  come  to  him  last  year  with  data  from  the  local  electric  company  on  historical  

occurrences  of  power  outages  and  their  durations  over  the  past  10  years,  the  probably  of  an  

outage  lasting  more  than  24  hours  was  0.5%  (see  example  in  Figure  3).  She  had  then  explained  that  

the  loss  of  data  and  process  set-­‐backs  that  would  occur  with  an  outage  lasting  more  than  24  hours  

could  reach  $1.5M!  Jim  quickly  agreed  to  invest  $35,000  for  their  new  generator.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                7  Tang,  Christopher  S.  (2006),  “Perspectives  in  supply  chain  risk  management,”  International  Journal  of  Production  Economics,  Vol.  103,   No.  2,  pp.  451-­‐488.  

This  document  is