Summarize Northrop Frye’s article “Isn’t It Time to Start Thinking?” with 8 sentences that summarizes the key points from Frye’s article.
you should…
list the title and author in the first sentence
identify Frye’s key points
be concise (8 sentences in length total for the summary)
use your own words (no direct quotations or slight changes with a thesaurus)
Below is the article
“Don’t You Think It’s Time to Start Thinking?” By Northrop Frye
A student often leaves high school today without any sense of language as a structure.
He may also have the idea that reading and writing are elementary skills that he mastered in childhood, never having grasped the fact that there are differ?ences in levels of reading and writing as there are in mathematics between short division and integral calculus.
Yet, in spite of his limited verbal skills, he firmly believes that he can think, that he has ideas, and that if he is just given the opportunity to express them he will be all right. Of course, when you look at what he’s written you find it doesn’t make any sense. When you tell him this he is devastated.
Part of his confusion here stems from the fact that we use the word “think” in so many bad, punning ways. Remember James Thurber’s Walter Mitty who was always dreaming great dreams of glory. When his wife asked him what he was doing he would say, “Has it ever occurred to you that I might be thinking?”
But, of course, he wasn’t thinking at all. Because we use it for everything our minds do, worrying, remembering, daydreaming, we imagine that think?ing is something that can be achieved without any training. But again it’s a matter of practice. How well we can think depends on how much of it we have already done. Most students need to be taught, very carefully and patiently, that there is no such thing as an inarticulate idea waiting to have the right words wrapped around it.
They have to learn that ideas do not exist until they have been incorporated into words. Until that point you don’t know whether you are pregnant or just have gas on the stomach.
The operation of thinking is the practice of articulating ideas until they are in the right words. And we can’t think at random either. We can only add one more idea to the body of something doing this and this is why there are so few people we regard as having any power to articulate at all. When such a person appears in pub?lic life, like Mr. Trudeau, we tend to regard him as possessing a gigantic intellect.
A society like ours doesn’t have very much interest in literacy. It is compulso?ry to read and write because society must have docile and obedient citizens. We are taught to read so that we can obey the traffic signs and to cipher so that we can make out our income tax, but development of verbal competency is very much left to the individual.
When we look at our day-to-day existence, we can see that there are strong currents at work against the development of powers of articulateness. Young adolescents today often betray a curious sense of shame about speaking articu?lately, of framing a sentence with a period at the end of it.
Part of the reason for this is the powerful anti-intellectual drive which is con?stantly present in our society. Articulate speech marks you out as an individual, and in some settings this can be rather dangerous because people are often suspicious and frightened of articulateness. So, if you say as little as possible and use only stereotyped, ready-made phrases you can hide yourself in the mass.
Then there are various epidemics sweeping over society which use unintelli?gibility as a weapon to preserve the present power structure. By making things as unintelligible as possible, to as many people as possible, you can hold the present power structure together. Understanding and articulateness lead to its destruction. This is the kind of thing that George Orwell was talking about, not just in Nineteen Eighty-Four, but in all his work on language. The kernel of everything reactionary and tyrannical in society is the impoverishment of the means of verbal communication.
The vast majority of things that we hear today are prejudices and clichés, simply verbal formulas that have no thought behind them but are put up as a pretense of thinking. It is not until we realize these things conceal meaning, rather than reveal it, that we can begin to develop our own powers of articulateness.
The teaching of humanities is, therefore, a militant job. Teachers are faced not simply with a mass of misconceptions and unexamined assumptions. They must engage in a fight to help the student confront and reject the verbal formulas and stock responses, to convert passive acceptance into active, constructive power. It is a fight against illiteracy and for the maturation of the mental process, for the development of skills which once acquired will never become obsolete
