Just because you thought of an interesting research question and have a desire to conduct research does not mean that your research will automatically be supported by faculty or funded by an organization. In order to gain stakeholder approval, you must submit a research proposal. Much like an outline of a paper or a treatment of a movie script, the research proposal contains several parts that begin with a research question and end with a literature review. For this Assignment, you compile a research proposal that includes a research problem, research question, and a literature review.
For this Assignment, choose between the case studies entitled "Social Work Research: Couple Counseling" and "Social Work Research: Using Multiple Assessments." Consider how you might select among the issues presented to formulate a research proposal.
Be sure to consult the outline in Chapter 14 the Yegidis et al. text for content suggestions for the sections of a research proposal. As you review existing research studies, notice how the authors identify a problem, focus the research question, and summarize relevant literature. These can provide you with a model for your research proposal.
By Day 7
Submit a 5- to 6-page research proposal stating both a research problem and a broad research question (may be either qualitative or quantitative). Use 6–10 of the most relevant literature resources to support the need for the study, define concepts, and define variables relevant to the question. Include a literature review explaining what previous research has found in relation to your problem and question. The literature review should also include a description of methods used by previous researchers. Finally, be sure to explain how your proposed study addresses a gap in existing knowledge.
Running head: COUPLE COUNSELING 1
COUPLE COUNSELING
2
Couple Counseling
Student Name
Professor Name
June 23, 2017
Couple Counseling
Introduction
The consequences of marital disappointment are serious and happen to people of all races, ages, and social foundations. For example, the divorce has unfavorable ramifications not really on the kids but rather additionally for the guardians and which keep going for quite a long time. To advance family life training, talented specialist run restorative projects that address issues like child rearing, compelling communication, marital satisfaction, to express a couple. Similarly, particular religious associations and houses of worship have not been abandoned and have essentially put resources into programs gone for building up sound family working.
Problem Statement
Most marriages don't come up short for a similar reason despite the fact that the absence of compelling communication between couples is the main consideration. Coincidently, social work authorities consider mediation endeavors more than aversion endeavors while tending to issues of marital disappointment caused by components, for example, betrayal, business, kid raising, distinctive desires, and so forth.
As of late, extraordinary academic work has vigorously censored the connection between marital satisfaction as well as effective relational abilities. Some famous advisor emphasizes that resentful marriages all the more regularly determine by disappointed yearnings of both of the gatherings that incompletely or not mirror a genuine crevice of powerful communication.
Moreover, troubled couples may want to convey in a negative which can persuade unpleasing aims from either party and henceforth the requirement for this examination to inspect on how communication is a basic figure constructing a solid relationship. It is my expectation that the discoveries of this examination will upgrade responsibility in the current helpful projects, will conquer any hindrance and the present presumptions on interchanges as a system of advancing relational unions. The connected research additionally anticipates that would add to existing social and political concentration in marriage arranging and marital directing administrations. At last, the discoveries of this examination will go about as manual for the scholars in making religious reflections about relational unions and drawing the best bits of knowledge that fit diverse marriage issues
Research Questions
The fundamental objective of couple counseling is more often than not to upgrade satisfaction and stability for parties in a relationship. Advancement of the communication abilities by either accomplice in marriage will probably encourage fellowship and along these lines reinforce closeness between couples since it elevates to decision-making and joint problem-solving. The research questions for this paper are:
(1) Is involvement in couple counseling likely to enhance couple’s communication?
(2) Is the couple counseling is beneficial to enhance satisfaction and stability for the couple?
(3) “Is couples counseling during times of the marital discord linked to the greater satisfaction of a marriage and less likelihood of divorce?”
Research Design
The marriage satisfaction scale was isolated into two gatherings so as to investigate the connection between the factors of premium. Of the 25 reactions, 20 people put in the high satisfaction range, and four people were set in the low satisfaction to go. For the main research question, Chi-square examination was utilized to investigate the connection between premarital counseling and the level of ebb and flow marital satisfaction. For the second research question, the members isolated into two gatherings, the individuals who got couples directing and the individuals who did not get couples counseling.
Chi-square utilized to investigate the connection between couples directing and marital satisfaction. For the third research question, the members isolated into two gatherings, the individuals who got premarital counseling and the individuals who take part in couples counseling. Chi-square was utilized to investigate the connection between premarital counseling and its indicator of later couples counseling.
Literature Review
A fruitful marriage is one which is very esteemed by the larger part of Americans, and over 80% of grown-ups will get hitched sooner or later in their lifetime. Fruitful relational unions are ones that mirror couples' capacity to see blemished individuals in faultless ways. Imply accomplices usually participate in a variety of keen procedures that authorize them to see each other and their connections in a hopeful way and support their commitments to each other. There is broad research on what makes relational unions work; Researchers have found that no single component is responsible for deciding relationship quality or lastingness (Vangelisti, 2015).
According to Phillips (2009), negative conduct happens in all relational unions however when it occurs among cheerfully wedded couples; they will probably legitimize it as being irregular or as owing to the weight and nervousness of the circumstance. Comparable research has discovered that a reiteration of regular positive collaborations and routine association in joint exercises delivers an expansion in marital adjustment and Satisfaction. Couples which satisfied with marriage often take an interest in practices, for example, kissing, embracing, and talking with the life partner about their day (Erin E. Phillips, 2009).
The normal engagement in these sorts of communications prompts contemplations of closeness and association that provide for a mutual esteem; when dreary, designed, and critical, they go up against a typical and solid significance of attachment. As indicated by Carroll and William, marriage in the United States is risky, because a vast amount of research demonstrates that marriage underwrites passionate and physical wellbeing, while uneven relational unions that outcome in separation can challenge prosperity and prompt an expansive social and monetary weight (Jason S. Carroll, 2003).
Controlled couples will be couples that defeat their contradictions in ways that empower critical thinking and does not hurt their relationship. Be that as it may, the communication between nonregulated couples can be dangerous; rather than utilizing critical thinking strategies, it makes raised strains and builds the couple's anguish. Obviously, nonregulated couples set aside a lengthier opportunity to skip over from a difference and are more averse to get a determination of their issue, which brings about the reoccurrence of the contradiction and duration of their unique debate (Ted G. Futris, 2011).
One investigation found that contradiction substance and communication style are both supporters of separation. The relationship between contention points and the procedure of communication improves the probability of separation. It is particularly genuine when couples are differing about accounts (Dew, 2011).
At the point when life partners unequipped for settling differentiating ramifications of cash or have clashing objectives for spending or sparing their cash, differences have a tendency to emerge. Both married couples report that their monetary contentions are harder to unravel, last more, and are more critical to them than different sorts of debate. Indeed, even while examining for different clarifications for contentions, there is proof to hint that cash debate between mates communicated with decreasing in marital satisfaction (Jeffrey Dew, 2012).
The upside of having couples make their objectives is that they can build up a familiarity with conceivable regions of ambiguity, convictions, and techniques for taking care of contention. It frequently consolidates a more profound understanding of one's bona fide identity and identifies defects that can be just slighted or intentionally disregarded all through the dating stage. As per Vail (2012), the premarital counseling that fixations on reasonable, doable objectives, and joins important, hint cooperation amid the main phases of marriage, could be more critical and helpful later on (Vail, 2012).
As indicated by Yilmaz and Kalkan (2010), premarital advancement programs fundamentally increment the relationship satisfaction level. Their discoveries demonstrated that couples that partook in premarital counseling showed higher relationship satisfaction levels when contrasted with couples in the control gatherings. The couples that participated in the premarital directing were recognizing implanted issues and creating approaches to take care of these issues (Tugba Yilmaz, 2010).
Conclusion
Past research has distinguished the significance of couples counseling. Furthermore, past research has distinguished different projects and aptitude ranges that are gainful to couples. In any case, the particular ranges identified with getting ready for marriage and critical thinking amid strife in connection to satisfaction have not altogether investigated. This examination meant to investigate the effect of couples counseling on marital satisfaction. Through a mysterious online study, 25 members who are as of now or beforehand hitched made a request to approach their encounters with premarital directing, couples counseling, and satisfaction with marriage.
A chi-square examination decided the relationship between factors. Nonetheless, because of various confinements, the outcomes were not noteworthy. This examination assessed how premarital counseling and couples directing affected marital satisfaction among couples. Despite the fact that the scientist did not discover huge outcomes, there was a pattern of investment in premarital counseling and marital satisfaction. The outcomes propose that further research should lead with a specific end goal to decide the relationship between premarital counseling, couples directing, and marital satisfaction.
References Dew, J. (2011). The association between consumer debt and the likelihood of divorce. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. Erin E. Phillips, R. J. (2009). Connecting Behaviors and Newlyweds’ Sense of Shared-Meaning and Relationship Satisfaction. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. Jason S. Carroll, a. W. (2003). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Premarital Prevention Programs: A Meta-Analytic Review of Outcome Research. Family Relations. Jeffrey Dew, S. B. (2012). Examining the Relationship Between Financial. Family Relations. Ted G. Futris, A. W. (2011). The impact of prepare on engaged couples: Variations by delivery format. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy . Tugba Yilmaz, M. K. (2010). The effects of a premarital relationship enrichment Program on Relationship Satisfaction. ERIC. Vail, S. H. (2012). Reducing the divorce rate among Christians in America: Making premarital counseling a prerequisite for marriage. Liberty University Baptist Theological Seminary . Vangelisti, A. (2015). Communication in personal relationships. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology.